arXiv preprint ·
Eye Tracking Signal Quality Evaluation: Meta Quest Pro vs HTC VIVE Pro Eye vs HTC VIVE Focus Vision
- Published
- Source
- arXiv preprint, posted before peer review
- Original
- Read it at arXiv
- Topics
Abstract
Gaze research in virtual reality needs eye trackers of known error. Thirty participants completed the same protocol on the Meta Quest Pro (QP), HTC VIVE Pro Eye (PE) and HTC VIVE Focus Vision (FV); to our knowledge, this is the first evaluation of the FV eye tracker. In a random-saccade task, median participant mean error was 1.04° on QP, 1.50° on PE and 2.41° on FV, which remained least accurate after linear recalibration. In a later block with a darker background, PE error rose by 0.70°. FV samples were positively correlated: dispersion was 9.8 times the sample-to-sample root mean square. The device clocks showed losses that mean error hides. QP paused for up to 6.04 s, and FV skipped single samples. During instructed eye closures, QP flagged every sample valid while gaze moved 9.74°. Evaluations should report repeated timestamps, loss composition on the device clock and validity during eye closures.
The authors’ abstract, as arXiv lists it. arXiv’s listings, abstracts included, are free for anyone to reuse.
Read it on ReadSearch
Each opens after you create an account, and brings you back to this paper.
More in Human-Computer Interaction
CRM-Agent-Bench: Benchmarking Tool-Using Agents in Stateful Enterprise Environments
A Personalized and Adaptive Intelligent Tutoring System for Psychomotor Learning
Gaze Under Strain: How Oculomotor Behavior Tracks Cybersickness Progression in VR
EEGBiFormer: Real-Time EEG Attention Classification via Hybrid CNN-Transformer with EEG-Informed Auditory Protocol Validation
Beyond Correctness: How Novice Software Engineering Students Exercise Oversight of Generative AI
Get the few papers worth your time in Human-Computer Interaction every morning.
ReadSearch reads the new papers in your field each day and brings you the few worth reading, each with its key finding in a sentence.