arXiv preprint ·

ReMedI: Inference-Time Refinement and Self-Distillation for Controllable Molecular Optimization

Jia Yi Zhang, Shivanshu Shekhar, Allison McLevige and Tong Zhang

Published
Source
arXiv preprint, posted before peer review
Original
Read it at arXiv
Topics
Machine LearningArtificial Intelligence

Abstract

In drug development, lead optimization must improve competing properties, such as increasing permeability and reducing toxicity, while limiting scaffold changes that could compromise the lead's potency. RL-based post-training, such as C-MORAL, addresses this problem by fine-tuning molecular language models to directly optimize molecular leads for objectives of interest, which relies on expensive task-specific datasets and faces challenges in achieving multi-objective optimization (MOO). We argue a pre-trained model may already contain useful molecular edits that zero-shot generation cannot efficiently reach. Motivated by the limited search capabilities of zero-shot generation, we develop an efficient Metropolis-Hastings search strategy to better explore the proposal distribution. We propose ReMedI, which uses the molecular language model as a base proposer for inference-time alignment. Given a lead and a set of multi-objective tasks, the model proposes edits conditioned on the current molecule, while Metropolis--Hastings refinement guides sequential edits under an objective for property improvement, preservation, and lead similarity. On both C-MuMOInstruct and SMDD benchmarks, refinement improves frozen base models across three backbones, reaching significantly higher multi-objective optimization success rates compared to baselines. These search traces can then distilled into the base model which improves zero-shot generation and subsequent search using approximately 7.8 times less training molecular leads than that of C-MORAL. ReMedI achieves approximately 2.8 times the strict-success coverage of RL baseline C-MORAL, including on out-of-distribution tasks, with matched lead-relative similarity.

The authors’ abstract, as arXiv lists it. arXiv’s listings, abstracts included, are free for anyone to reuse.

Read it on ReadSearch

Each opens after you create an account, and brings you back to this paper.

Already a reader? Sign in

All new papers in Machine Learning

Get the few papers worth your time in Machine Learning every morning.

ReadSearch reads the new papers in your field each day and brings you the few worth reading, each with its key finding in a sentence.

Papers belong to their authors and publishers; every page here links to the original. All research topics