arXiv preprint ·
CEMIR vs. FISER: a comparative study of reasoning-based and enrichment-based approaches to pragmatic intent recognition
- Published
- Source
- arXiv preprint, posted before peer review
- Original
- Read it at arXiv
- Topics
Abstract
Intent recognition in human-robot interaction requires agents to resolve ambiguous natural language instructions by inferring the speaker's underlying goals. Research has increasingly focused on two notable paradigms for addressing this task: structured symbolic reasoning and multimodal input enrichment. However, it remains unclear whether enrichment-based methods provide benefit in settings where the ambiguity concerns unstated human intent rather than missing observable scene information. In this paper, we present a comparative and diagnostic study benchmarking FISER - a framework utilizing structured social and embodied reasoning - against CEMIR (Context-Enriched Multimodal Intent Recognition), a method that performs multimodal enrichment by synthesizing narratives and photorealistic images from textual prompts. By evaluating both approaches across four Large Language Models (LLMs), ranging from Qwen2.5-Omni-3B to GPT-5, on the HandMeThat v2 benchmark, we analyze their capability to resolve pragmatic ambiguities. Our statistical analysis, employing multiple-comparison correction, reveals no statistically significant difference in performance between FISER and CEMIR across any model or difficulty level. This pattern holds across all sixteen model-by-difficulty comparisons, as well as in a targeted ablation isolating CEMIR's narrative and visual components. Instead, performance is primarily associated with backbone capability and the inherent difficulty of the ambiguity. These findings suggest a boundary condition for text-derived multimodal enrichment: when the relevant task constraints are already available in the textual instruction, synthetic multimodal augmentation may not provide measurable benefit over structured reasoning on the same text.
The authors’ abstract, as arXiv lists it. arXiv’s listings, abstracts included, are free for anyone to reuse.
Read it on ReadSearch
Each opens after you create an account, and brings you back to this paper.
More in Artificial Intelligence
MOTIO: Agentic Skill Engineering for Reality-Grounded Humanoid Loco-Manipulation
DiscoDemo: Discovering Efficient and Diverse Robot Demonstrations for Imitation Learning
SCET-CBF: Speed-Calibrated Soft Guidance for One-Step Dynamic Navigation
TTT in VLA Models: Exploring Training with Human Demonstrations
A Differentiable Chassis Safety Layer for Intelligent Vehicle Motion Control
Get the few papers worth your time in Artificial Intelligence every morning.
ReadSearch reads the new papers in your field each day and brings you the few worth reading, each with its key finding in a sentence.