arXiv preprint ·
Understanding Communication Failures in Multi-Agent LLM Systems
- Published
- Source
- arXiv preprint, posted before peer review
- Original
- Read it at arXiv
- Topics
Abstract
Multi-agent LLM systems aim to improve reasoning through debate, evidence sharing, and mutual correction, but interaction can also introduce failures that final accuracy alone cannot explain. Agents may converge too early, ignore dissent, suppress correct minority answers, or preserve a wrong framing across rounds. We present a corpus-grounded taxonomy of communication failures, built from 3,211 failed multi-round trajectories across medical QA, coding, finance, multi-hop reasoning, ethics, and embodied text tasks. Using this taxonomy, we analyze failure distributions across datasets and system designs, round-level error dynamics, recovery hardness, majority transitions, minority-signal suppression, and self-reported confidence. We find that failures are dominated by recovery/correction and consensus/decision problems rather than isolated first-round mistakes, with many emerging after agents first observe peer responses. Based on these findings, we recommend stronger disagreement handling, evidence verification, minority-signal preservation, and recovery checks before finalization.
The authors’ abstract, as arXiv lists it. arXiv’s listings, abstracts included, are free for anyone to reuse.
Read it on ReadSearch
Each opens after you create an account, and brings you back to this paper.
More in Artificial Intelligence
MI-MIDI 2: From Observation to Control with Sparse Autoencoders in Text-to-MIDI Generation
AgentOrch: How Close Can Global Orchestration Come to Step-by-Step Interaction?
CEMIR vs. FISER: a comparative study of reasoning-based and enrichment-based approaches to pragmatic intent recognition
How To Build A Modern Diffusion Language Model
BARC-Bench: Benign Asks, Risky Consequences
Get the few papers worth your time in Artificial Intelligence every morning.
ReadSearch reads the new papers in your field each day and brings you the few worth reading, each with its key finding in a sentence.