arXiv preprint ·
PPO vs. SAC: A Comparative Study for Cooperative Motion Control of Dual-Arm Space Robots
- Published
- Source
- arXiv preprint, posted before peer review
- Original
- Read it at arXiv
- Topics
Abstract
The growing population of orbital debris has intensified interest in active debris removal and on-orbit servicing, for which dual-arm space manipulators offer improved grasping stability and load distribution relative to single-arm systems. However, coordinating two manipulators under inter-arm collision avoidance, orientation alignment, and sensing uncertainty remains challenging. This paper develops a coordinated reinforcement learning framework for cooperative motion planning of a dual-arm space manipulator in a target-reaching task with inter-arm collision-avoidance constraints. A centralized state representation combines joint-space, end-effector, and target-relative information, while a multi-objective reward function promotes target-reaching accuracy, orientation alignment, motion smoothness, synchronized task completion, and collision avoidance. Within this framework, Proximal Policy Optimization (PPO) and Soft Actor-Critic (SAC) are compared as representative on-policy and off-policy algorithms, and the learned policies are further evaluated for generalization to previously unseen target configurations. Across five random seeds, SAC substantially outperforms PPO within the considered fixed-base simulation scenarios: it reaches an 80% success threshold in every seed (median 1.6M environment steps) whereas PPO does not reach it within a 4M-step budget, and it attains a higher mean success rate (78.6% versus 7.4%) with lower position and orientation errors and tighter bimanual synchronization. Both algorithms degrade on unseen boundary targets, but SAC retains most of its performance while PPO's collapses. The results also expose a failure mode of PPO: under the two-phase shaped reward, it tends to converge to a reward-loitering local optimum rather than committing to the precision task. This behavior highlights the sensitivity of on-policy learning to reward shaping.
The authors’ abstract, as arXiv lists it. arXiv’s listings, abstracts included, are free for anyone to reuse.
Read it on ReadSearch
Each opens after you create an account, and brings you back to this paper.
More in Artificial Intelligence
MI-MIDI 2: From Observation to Control with Sparse Autoencoders in Text-to-MIDI Generation
AgentOrch: How Close Can Global Orchestration Come to Step-by-Step Interaction?
CEMIR vs. FISER: a comparative study of reasoning-based and enrichment-based approaches to pragmatic intent recognition
How To Build A Modern Diffusion Language Model
BARC-Bench: Benign Asks, Risky Consequences
Get the few papers worth your time in Artificial Intelligence every morning.
ReadSearch reads the new papers in your field each day and brings you the few worth reading, each with its key finding in a sentence.