arXiv preprint ·
Knowing Whom to Trust is not Enough: The Trust--Agreement Gap in Repeated Multi-Party LLM Negotiation
- Published
- Source
- arXiv preprint, posted before peer review
- Original
- Read it at arXiv
- Topics
Abstract
Large language model (LLM) agents increasingly participate in negotiations on behalf of individuals and organizations, yet they remain vulnerable to manipulation, particularly in repeated multi-party interactions. Classical multi-agent systems address this challenge through explicit trust and reputation models, whereas existing work on LLM negotiation largely treats trust as an emergent phenomenon. We investigate whether LLM agents can form useful trust estimates from prior interactions and leverage them to improve future negotiation outcomes. We introduce a repeated, multi-party, multi-issue negotiation framework in which recurring agents participate in a sequence of negotiation games while one participant covertly attempts to prevent agreement. After each game, agents assess their counterparts and maintain pairwise trust estimates that carry over to subsequent negotiations. We compare trust-aware and trust-agnostic agents and analyze how explicit trust influences negotiation outcomes. Our results reveal a \emph{trust--agreement gap}: trust-aware agents can identify the adversary within a few games, but accurate trust estimates do not consistently translate into better agreements. Trust increases agreement rates by up to 23 percentage points, but only when agents are explicitly guided to use it in their decisions. Explicit trust can therefore improve repeated LLM negotiations, but its value depends critically on how trust is assessed and incorporated into agents' reasoning.
The authors’ abstract, as arXiv lists it. arXiv’s listings, abstracts included, are free for anyone to reuse.
Read it on ReadSearch
Each opens after you create an account, and brings you back to this paper.
More in Artificial Intelligence
Governed Self-Evolution for Autonomous Investing: A Multi-Agent LLM System with an Invariant Core
Markets of Minds: A 51-Billion-State Economy of Intelligence
LLM Multi-Agent Systems Are Vulnerable to Herding and Runaway Cascades
Empirically Calibrated Differential Games for Simulating Driver Interactions
ABRA: Agent-Bound UI for Human-Agent Communication beyond Chat with Reusable Views
Get the few papers worth your time in Artificial Intelligence every morning.
ReadSearch reads the new papers in your field each day and brings you the few worth reading, each with its key finding in a sentence.