arXiv preprint ·
Markets of Minds: A 51-Billion-State Economy of Intelligence
- Published
- Source
- arXiv preprint, posted before peer review
- Original
- Read it at arXiv
- Topics
Abstract
When intelligence is shared, reasoning becomes a constrained allocation problem. In a population of agents with limited access to expert models, an intervention can benefit its recipient yet still be a poor use of shared capacity if another feasible intervention has greater expected value. Assistance must therefore be evaluated through both its marginal benefit and the opportunity cost induced by budgets, access, scarcity, and service capacity. To this end, we introduce Markets of Minds, a framework for allocating expert reasoning across agents before expert outputs are observed. For each feasible agent-service pair, the framework estimates the expected gain from assistance relative to the agent's default continuation, explicitly separating repair benefit from regression risk, and jointly clears assistance contracts under shared resource constraints. We then study this problem in a dependency-aware agent economy with 51.2 billion addressable persona-market states spanning capabilities, cognitive budgets, provider access, scarcity, and network roles. These dependencies couple allocation feasibility across agents rather than the outcome of a fixed contract. Empirically, in a matched replay of 240 cases under a common 30% assistance quota, the frozen allocator reaches 85.42% task-level persona adherence versus 73.86% for equal-capacity random allocation, a gain of 11.56 percentage points. The results show that assistance value is heterogeneous and can be negative, and that scarcity changes which interventions are worth purchasing. Together, these findings motivate a population-level view of intelligence where the value of assistance depends not only on what it can achieve, but also on which alternative uses of scarce cognitive capacity it displaces.
The authors’ abstract, as arXiv lists it. arXiv’s listings, abstracts included, are free for anyone to reuse.
Read it on ReadSearch
Each opens after you create an account, and brings you back to this paper.
More in Multiagent Systems
Agent-to-Agent Synthetic Social Engineering on the Web
Empirically Calibrated Differential Games for Simulating Driver Interactions
Secure and Functional Code Generation with Self-Evaluation
PULSES: multi-agent AI for autonomous excited-state model building and dynamics
Build, Don't Play: Self-Improving LLM Research Agents Develop a Hearthstone Battlegrounds AI That Rivals Top Players
Get the few papers worth your time in Multiagent Systems every morning.
ReadSearch reads the new papers in your field each day and brings you the few worth reading, each with its key finding in a sentence.