arXiv preprint ·
Diagnosing Personalization Failures in Mobile GUI Agents
- Published
- Source
- arXiv preprint, posted before peer review
- Original
- Read it at arXiv
- Topics
Abstract
Unlike conventional GUI agents, personalized GUI agents require user preferences to guide sequential execution over changing GUI states. This raises two challenges: determining HOW each preference should alter execution strategy and WHEN it should take effect along the interaction trajectory. Existing benchmarks primarily evaluate overall task success, offering limited insight into these questions. We introduce PrefDiag-Bench with two components: (1) a categorization of preferences into five types, characterizing HOW they affect execution; and (2) a stage-wise diagnostic framework with 1,664 probes, tracing WHEN preferences should take effect and where failures occur. We evaluate eleven GUI agent systems, including end-to-end agents and agentic workflows, under two forms of user context: explicit user profiles and behavioral memory logs. Although existing agents achieve relatively high completion rates on non-personalized tasks, performance is substantially lower on preference-personalized tasks. Even the best-performing model, Seed-2.0-Pro, achieves only 47.17% on Process preferences under explicit user profiles. Agents struggle particularly with Ranking and Process preferences. Further analysis reveals two key capability bottlenecks: selecting relevant evidence from user history and recognizing when preferences should take effect during execution. Controlled interventions that explicitly provide relevant evidence improve end-to-end task success by up to 7.06%. PrefDiag-Bench offers a more systematic evaluation of GUI agents' personalization capabilities beyond overall task success. Code and data are available at https://github.com/Zhixin-L/PrefDiag-Bench.
The authors’ abstract, as arXiv lists it. arXiv’s listings, abstracts included, are free for anyone to reuse.
Read it on ReadSearch
Each opens after you create an account, and brings you back to this paper.
More in Artificial Intelligence
Governed Self-Evolution for Autonomous Investing: A Multi-Agent LLM System with an Invariant Core
MI-MIDI 2: From Observation to Control with Sparse Autoencoders in Text-to-MIDI Generation
Lifetime-valid decisions by continually evolving AI analysts
CEMIR vs. FISER: a comparative study of reasoning-based and enrichment-based approaches to pragmatic intent recognition
BARC-Bench: Benign Asks, Risky Consequences
Get the few papers worth your time in Artificial Intelligence every morning.
ReadSearch reads the new papers in your field each day and brings you the few worth reading, each with its key finding in a sentence.