arXiv preprint ·
A Stratified Multi-Rater Evaluation of LLM-Based Virtual Standardized Patients with a Deployed Data-Generation Platform
- Published
- Source
- arXiv preprint, posted before peer review
- Original
- Read it at arXiv
- Topics
Abstract
The Objective Structured Clinical Examination (OSCE) is widely used to assess clinical communication skills in medical education, requiring trainees to take histories and reason clinically with standardized patients (SPs). Large language model (LLM)-based virtual standardized patients (VSPs), typically built by persona-injected prompting, offer a practical alternative. However, existing evaluations rely on a single backbone LLM, small human rater panels, or LLM-as-a-judge scoring without an utterance-aligned human-expert reference, and so cannot identify the specific shortcomings of individual models. We evaluated four LLMs (GPT-4o, Claude 3.5 Sonnet, Llama-3.1 70B, and HyperCLOVA X), spanning commercial, open-source and Korean-developed models, against a human-expert reference across three Korean OSCE cases (hematuria, fever in pregnancy, and chronic cough). In a double-blind, fully crossed design, 17 senior medical-student raters scored every model utterance on three sentence-level and six encounter-level Likert metrics, yielding 7,480 data points. We analyzed the scores using a stratified linear mixed-effects model based on an 11-category history-taking and 3-level linguistic-form taxonomy. At the encounter level, three of the four LLMs fell 0.08 to 0.47 Likert points below the human-expert reference on Comprehensibility, Consistency and Hallucination-freeness. The difference was not statistically significant for Hallucination-freeness in Claude 3.5 Sonnet and GPT-4o, Consistency in GPT-4o, and Engagement in HyperCLOVA X. Llama-3.1 70B fell significantly below the reference on all six metrics. We also introduce a web-based OSCE platform that supports virtual practice across diverse clinical cases and continuously collects student-VSP dialogues under research and privacy consent.
The authors’ abstract, as arXiv lists it. arXiv’s listings, abstracts included, are free for anyone to reuse.
Read it on ReadSearch
Each opens after you create an account, and brings you back to this paper.
More in Human-Computer Interaction
GenXR-Bench: Benchmarking Coding Agents for Interactive XR Development
Atlas: Making Sense of Long Horizon Agent Trajectories
HumanCentric-Scenes-AI: A Human-Curated Multimodal Dataset of AI-Generated Human-Centric Scenes Across Surveillance, Occupational Portraits, AI-Edited Images, and Short-Form Video
Beyond Better Ideas: How Human-AI Collaboration Shapes Scientific Ideas and Human Perceptions
MHeatmap: Two-Walk Laplacian Reordering and Mosaic Layout for Rectangular Matrix Visualization
Get the few papers worth your time in Human-Computer Interaction every morning.
ReadSearch reads the new papers in your field each day and brings you the few worth reading, each with its key finding in a sentence.