arXiv preprint ·
Unit-Aware Differentially Private Quantum Machine Learning for Clinical and Wearable Health Data
- Published
- Source
- arXiv preprint, posted before peer review
- Original
- Read it at arXiv
- Topics
In brief
A Fair Privacy Test for Quantum Health Models
The authors compare quantum models with capacity-matched multilayer perceptrons and logistic regression on three clinical cohorts and one wearable cohort, evaluating five privacy budgets across five seeds. The quantum model leads on three clinical cohorts, but the differences do not survive multiple-comparison correction; a hardware experiment also tests whether private-model inference works on a real quantum processor.
What they found: On three clinical cohorts, the quantum model led the classical models by up to 0.104 ROC AUC averaged across privacy budgets, but it trailed on the wearable cohort, where the small participant count meant substantial noise. None of the differences survived Holm correction across 24 tests, so the results are suggestive rather than evidence of a reliable quantum advantage.
AI-written summary. Check anything you rely on against the original paper.
Abstract
Clinical registries and wearable sensors support early health-risk assessment, yet models trained on these records may leak sensitive information when released. Differential privacy (DP) bounds this leakage by injecting noise whose total magnitude grows with the number of trainable parameters, a cost especially severe for small health cohorts. This motivates parameter efficient models including quantum machine learning (QML), whose variational circuits can represent complex decision boundaries with few trainable parameters. It raises a question: at matched input dimensionality and privacy budget, does a quantum model retain more utility than a classical one? We investigate this question on three clinical cohorts and one wearable cohort, treating each clinical record or participant as a privacy unit. We compare capacity-matched quantum, multilayer perceptron, and logistic regression models across five privacy budgets and five seeds. The quantum model leads on three clinical cohorts by up to 0.104 ROC AUC averaged across budgets; however, trails on the wearable cohort, where the small number of participants requires substantial noise. No difference survives Holm correction across 24 tests, so these results indicate a trend rather than a quantum advantage. An analytic gradient bound shows that lower clipping thresholds can improve utility by reducing noise despite clipping bias. Finally, an experiment on IBM quantum computer (ibm_fez, a 156-qubit superconducting processor) using eight fixed test cases yields mean absolute probability errors of 0.046 (private) and 0.063 (non-private) relative to simulation, supporting the feasibility of inference on noisy intermediate-scale quantum (NISQ) hardware. Code is publicly available at https://github.com/TITANS-Lab-Artifacts/DP-QML-Health.
The authors’ abstract, as arXiv lists it. arXiv’s listings, abstracts included, are free for anyone to reuse.
Read it on ReadSearch
Each opens after you create an account, and brings you back to this paper.
More in Machine Learning
Multi-Objective Evolutionary Semi-Supervised Learning for Resource-Aware Smart City Classification
Gate Initialisation versus Recurrent Dropout and Zoneout in Learning Long Dependencies: A Controlled Study of LSTM and GRU Networks on Synthetic Tasks
Reconstruction differences rival individual differences in the fly compass connectome and break trained circuit models
Peer-Relative Trust-Guided Update Screening for Robust Semi-Decentralized Federated Learning under Label-Flipping Attacks
BrainCodes: A Lightweight EEG Foundation Model over Discrete Neural Codes
Get the few papers worth your time in Machine Learning every morning.
ReadSearch reads the new papers in your field each day and brings you the few worth reading, each with its key finding in a sentence.