arXiv preprint ·
Reconstruction differences rival individual differences in the fly compass connectome and break trained circuit models
- Published
- Source
- arXiv preprint, posted before peer review
- Original
- Read it at arXiv
- Topics
Abstract
Neural network models are increasingly constructed from synapse-resolution connectomes, and the same circuit is now available in reconstructions from other animals and pipelines. We do not know whether such models are dependent on the reconstruction they are built from, and whether connectome differences are biological or measurement errors. We studied the Drosophila head-direction circuit in nine versions: four flies (male CNS, hemibrain, FlyWire, BANC) and five variants of the same fly varying only by thresholds, proofreading or synapse detection. Using wiring-based correspondences validated by anatomical labels, we place all differences on one scale. A change of synapse detection within one fly changed the circuit more than halfway to the smallest between-fly difference on four distance measures; proofreading differences were smaller but depended on the metric, and left and right halves of one fly differed no more than random halves. Networks trained on each wiring to hold a cued heading developed near-perfect ring attractors, but their error increased from below 1 degree to 10-28 degrees when all weights changed by 1%. Training on each wiring did not transfer to any other connectome, including other versions of the same fly; refitting thirty cell-type gains, we repaired filtering-level differences but remaining error depended on wiring distance. Training with noise lowered precision and gave only partial transfer. In imaging data, the fly compass drifted gradually in darkness. Connectome-constrained models should report the reconstruction they were built on and be tested for robustness across reconstructions.
The authors’ abstract, as arXiv lists it. arXiv’s listings, abstracts included, are free for anyone to reuse.
Read it on ReadSearch
Each opens after you create an account, and brings you back to this paper.
More in Neural & Evolutionary Computing
Gate Initialisation versus Recurrent Dropout and Zoneout in Learning Long Dependencies: A Controlled Study of LSTM and GRU Networks on Synthetic Tasks
AgenticEvolve: Evolutionary Program Search with Persistent Language Model Agents that Design and Run Experiments
First hardware demonstration of a continuous-state probabilistic computer with programmable energy-defined sampling
BrainCodes: A Lightweight EEG Foundation Model over Discrete Neural Codes
ENCL: Enabling Efficient Neuromorphic Continual Learning with Local Learning Rule and Sub-Network Freezing Strategy
Get the few papers worth your time in Neural & Evolutionary Computing every morning.
ReadSearch reads the new papers in your field each day and brings you the few worth reading, each with its key finding in a sentence.