arXiv preprint ·
Digital Nudge Effects in Optimal Stopping Games: Antagonistic Interactions in Layered Choice Architectures
- Published
- Source
- arXiv preprint, posted before peer review
- Original
- Read it at arXiv
- Topics
Abstract
Digital nudges have become a prominent area of research in human-centered interaction, yet little is known about how they interact when deployed together. This study examines the individual and combined effects of anchoring, salience, and social proof digital nudges on stopping behavior and outcome quality in a sequential decision task. Using a 2^3 between-subjects factorial design grounded in the secretary problem (N = 181), we find that (1) an anchor nudge significantly increased exploration rather than constraining it (b = 1.207, p = .017); (2) the salience nudge produced the smallest effect of any condition; and (3) combining the anchor and social proof nudges produced the worst outcome quality of any condition ($181.83 vs. $192.21 for anchor-only), with outcome quality declining monotonically as nudge count increased. These findings provide the first controlled evidence for a digital nudge crowding-out effect with direct implications for the ethical design of digital interfaces.
The authors’ abstract, as arXiv lists it. arXiv’s listings, abstracts included, are free for anyone to reuse.
Read it on ReadSearch
Each opens after you create an account, and brings you back to this paper.
More in Human-Computer Interaction
Speculative Imbalance Positions by Non-Physical Traders: Impacts on Electricity System Balancing in Great Britain
Motivation and Contribution in Open Source Software: A Meta-Analytic Investigation
Occupational Uniqueness and Wage Growth
The Customer Is the Builder: How AI Coding Agents Are Rewriting the Economics of Software
The Delegation Divide: An Open Index of AI-Agent Delegability across Occupations and Countries
Get the few papers worth your time in Human-Computer Interaction every morning.
ReadSearch reads the new papers in your field each day and brings you the few worth reading, each with its key finding in a sentence.