arXiv preprint ·

Foundations of the Scaling Law

Tianyu Zhao and Zhixiang Ren

Published
Source
arXiv preprint, posted before peer review
Original
Read it at arXiv
Topics
Machine Learning

Abstract

Empirical scaling laws relate loss to parameters $N$, training tokens $D$ and compute $C$. This technical note explains three mechanisms behind their exponents. Local approximation bounds function error at rate $N_e^{-γs/d}$, with effective parameters $N_e$, smoothness $s$, reuse exponent $γ$ and dimension $d$; the loss function determines the risk bound. Independent feature coverage gives $α_D=(β-1)/ζ$ from predictive-weight decay $β$ and occurrence rarity $ζ$. Separable-loss optimization determines training allocations and deployment crossovers. Nonlinear scoring can produce apparent emergent abilities, while grokking concerns delayed generalization and verification constrains test-time scaling. For regular molecular configurations, the $\mathrm{SE}(3)$ quotient gives $d_{\mathrm{int}}=d-6$ and relative approximation-exponent gain $6/d_{\mathrm{int}}$. Optimized dense-to-equivariant excess-loss ratios scale as $C^{p_{\mathrm{eq}}-p_{\mathrm{dense}}}$, where $p_j$ are compute-loss exponents and the prefactor depends on loss amplitudes and FLOP costs. Domain examples also cover visual resolution, conformational coverage and correlated-sample precision.

The authors’ abstract, as arXiv lists it. arXiv’s listings, abstracts included, are free for anyone to reuse.

Read it on ReadSearch

Each opens after you create an account, and brings you back to this paper.

Already a reader? Sign in

All new papers in Machine Learning

Get the few papers worth your time in Machine Learning every morning.

ReadSearch reads the new papers in your field each day and brings you the few worth reading, each with its key finding in a sentence.

Papers belong to their authors and publishers; every page here links to the original. All research topics