arXiv preprint ·
Baseline and Incremental: User, Item, and Request Debiasing in Instagram Feed Ranking
- Published
- Source
- arXiv preprint, posted before peer review
- Original
- Read it at arXiv
- Topics
Abstract
A feed ranker scores candidates with a value model, a weighted sum of engagement predictions. Each prediction conflates a baseline, what this viewer, item or request would produce anyway, with the incremental amount by which this candidate exceeds it. The literature mostly removes the baseline. We argue that a multi-signal value model should keep the raw prediction and add the incremental part as a separately weighted term. On Instagram Feed, three debiasing families deployed independently, for viewer habit, item popularity and request context, are one parameterised operator, and a design procedure picks a point in it. Media-type (format) bias goes instead to a debiased label chosen by the same procedure. In a controlled four-arm ablation of deployed Feed terms (neither term, each alone, both), the two-term arm beats both single-term arms at production weights on point estimates in 11 of 13 judged (term, metric) pairs. Of the 26 direct contrasts, 17 are significantly for it and only 1 against it, on impressions. The ablation also suggests that the offline diagnostic should screen signals, not rank them. Such terms have served Instagram Feed production for most of a year. Beyond Feed, Meta, whose apps serve billions of people, has adopted the operator across surfaces, apps and both ranking stages. Its launches there drive sessions and daily active users, the core visitation and retention metrics.
The authors’ abstract, as arXiv lists it. arXiv’s listings, abstracts included, are free for anyone to reuse.
Read it on ReadSearch
Each opens after you create an account, and brings you back to this paper.
More in Information Retrieval
Our Own Jev: Typed Decisions in One Forward Pass, from an In-House Judge to Open LoRA Models
Factual Access States in Diffusion Language Models: From Mechanism to Knowledge Editing and Retrieval
Progressive Learning from Content to Relevance to Personalization for CTR Prediction
GARRET: Generative Feedback for Region Retrieval in Visual Documents
Reasoning-Search-Augmented LLMs: An Operational Taxonomy, Benchmark Analysis and Controlled Evidence Synthesis
Get the few papers worth your time in Information Retrieval every morning.
ReadSearch reads the new papers in your field each day and brings you the few worth reading, each with its key finding in a sentence.