arXiv preprint ·
Large-Scale Biomedical RAG: Corpus Scaling, Document Representation, and Efficiency Trade-offs
- Published
- Source
- arXiv preprint, posted before peer review
- Original
- Read it at arXiv
- Topics
Abstract
We present a controlled, large-scale evaluation of how corpus scale, document representation, and reranking affect the effectiveness and efficiency of biomedical Retrieval-Augmented Generation (RAG) systems. Retrieval collections were progressively expanded while retaining the relevant source documents, enabling consistent comparisons across corpus sizes. We compared abstract, flat full-text, and hierarchical full-text representations across first-stage retrieval, reranking, and end-to-end multiple-choice question answering. Configurations selected on development data were evaluated on five external biomedical benchmarks and a held-out test set, while retrieval latency and index storage were measured to quantify operational cost. Performance patterns observed with small or controlled collections did not consistently persist as collections grew, and the usefulness of reranking depended on the corpus and retrieval setting. RAG improved three of four model configurations across the external benchmarks, with mean gains of up to 9.6 percentage points, and improved all four configurations on the held-out test set by 10.2-30.3 points. Abstract retrieval performed best when reference evidence was abstract-aligned, whereas full-text representations were generally more effective when richer evidence was needed. Hierarchical representation matched or outperformed flat full-text retrieval in most end-to-end comparisons while requiring 67% fewer indexed units and 44-56% less storage. These findings show that corpus scale should be treated as an explicit evaluation variable in biomedical RAG, and that the most appropriate design depends on evidence format, model behavior, and operational constraints.
The authors’ abstract, as arXiv lists it. arXiv’s listings, abstracts included, are free for anyone to reuse.
Read it on ReadSearch
Each opens after you create an account, and brings you back to this paper.
More in Computation & Language / NLP
Knowledge Manifold Optimization for Scientific Discovery
Baseline and Incremental: User, Item, and Request Debiasing in Instagram Feed Ranking
Cross-Pollination Retrieval: Finding Transferable Ideas Across Fields in Scientific Literature
Factual Access States in Diffusion Language Models: From Mechanism to Knowledge Editing and Retrieval
MAPS: A Multi-Agent Personalized Script-Driven Video Advertising System Enhanced by Reinforcement Learning
Get the few papers worth your time in Computation & Language / NLP every morning.
ReadSearch reads the new papers in your field each day and brings you the few worth reading, each with its key finding in a sentence.