arXiv preprint ·
Towards More Granular Reasoning: Mapping the DSA Transparency Database Taxonomy to Platform Terms and Conditions Using Large Language Models
- Published
- Source
- arXiv preprint, posted before peer review
- Original
- Read it at arXiv
- Topics
Abstract
Article 24(5) of the Digital Services Act (DSA) requires providers of online platforms to submit every content moderation decision they make, with a corresponding Statement of Reasons (SoR), to the DSA Transparency Database (DSA-TDB). Such decisions are classified against seventeen high-level attribute categories that categorize the primary reason for the moderation decision. Because over 99.8% of statements cite a violation of the provider's own terms and conditions rather than a legal provision, the database is overwhelmingly a record of contractual enforcement using catch-all reporting; however, whether its categories actually describe those contractual rules well has not been examined. In this paper, we map the terms and conditions (T&C) of 31 designated online services against the DSA-TDB's high-level category taxonomy using a few-shot GPT-4.1 classifier over 447 policy documents. The analysis concerns how T&C rules are represented in the taxonomy, not how they are enforced. Two findings emerge. First, high-level category applicability varies sharply by service type: unsafe products account for 17.5% of e-commerce assignments and 0.2% of adult-platform assignments, and negative effects on civic discourse reaches 9.9% within the Meta family but is absent from adult platforms, Booking.com, and Wikipedia. Second, the categories have notable overlap among sub-category specifications, which makes assigning a single high-level category to a decision difficult. We argue that catch-all reporting is plausibly in part a consequence of the DSA-TDB's schema and attribute design, and recommend a schema that is differentiated by service type with more mandatory attributes derived inductively from platform governance language.
The authors’ abstract, as arXiv lists it. arXiv’s listings, abstracts included, are free for anyone to reuse.
Read it on ReadSearch
Each opens after you create an account, and brings you back to this paper.
More in Artificial Intelligence
Causal Humility: Governing the Authority of Fairness Claims Under Causal Uncertainty
When LLMs Manipulate: Measuring Behavioral, Social, and Temporal Effects
When Care Expands and Control Declines: Understanding Digital Privacy in End-of-Life Care
Evaluating LLM-Generated Feedback on Handwritten Mathematics: Feedback Quality and Subsequent Exam Performance
Conditional information Retrieval for Longitudinal Survey Harmonisation
Get the few papers worth your time in Artificial Intelligence every morning.
ReadSearch reads the new papers in your field each day and brings you the few worth reading, each with its key finding in a sentence.