arXiv preprint ·

Reinforcement Learning Controllers for Fusion Scenario Development

Evgeny Adishchev, Maxim Nurgaliev, Dmitry Sorokin, Alexander Granovsky, Maksim Stokolesov, Igor Prokofyev, Eduard Khairutdinov and Georgy Subbotin

Published
Source
arXiv preprint, posted before peer review
Original
Read it at arXiv
Topics
Plasma PhysicsMachine Learning

Abstract

Scenario development, the design of the waveforms that take a tokamak discharge from breakdown to flat-top, is still an iterative, labour-intensive process. Every candidate scenario has to be simulated with a controller in the loop, and the classical shape and current controllers need low-level actuator references. So the process is iterative and includes a number of trial-and-error steps. We propose to replace the per-scenario controller tuning by a single goal-conditioned reinforcement-learning controller trained once, in advance, against a free-boundary equilibrium and transport simulator. A scenario is then specified only by the target waveforms of the physical quantities of interest (plasma current, line-averaged electron density, LCFS shape, x-point positions), and the controller produces the coil-current and fueling commands that realize them. We demonstrate the approach on an EAST plasma-current ramp-up: the controller takes over a small limited plasma, ramps the current and the density, grows the cross-section, forms two x-points and holds a double-null diverted configuration against sampled shape targets for the rest of a 1.2 s episode. The neural network controller is trained using TQC algorithm. On 1024 test scenarios sampled from a low-discrepancy scrambled Sobol sequence in 11-dimensional target space, the controller forms the divertor in 86% of the cases, holds it for more than 0.5 s in 67% and reaches the end of the episode in a diverted state in 58%, with flat-top tracking errors of a few kA in plasma current, $\sim 0.15\times10^{19}$ m$^{-3}$ in density, $\sim 2$ cm in position and $\sim 8$ cm in x-point location; the failures concentrate at the high-current density ($J$) region which is believed to be physically or from engineering perspective not feasible within ohmic mode.

The authors’ abstract, as arXiv lists it. arXiv’s listings, abstracts included, are free for anyone to reuse.

Read it on ReadSearch

Each opens after you create an account, and brings you back to this paper.

Already a reader? Sign in

All new papers in Plasma Physics

Get the few papers worth your time in Plasma Physics every morning.

ReadSearch reads the new papers in your field each day and brings you the few worth reading, each with its key finding in a sentence.

Papers belong to their authors and publishers; every page here links to the original. All research topics