arXiv preprint ·
Inverse modelling of a laser-plasma accelerator
- Published
- Source
- arXiv preprint, posted before peer review
- Original
- Read it at arXiv
- Topics
Abstract
The electron beams of a laser-plasma accelerator depend non-linearly on the laser and gas settings. This dependence is explored using particle-in-cell (PIC) simulations, and machine-learning models trained on these simulations predict the beam from the settings. Here we address the reverse problem: given a measured beam, which settings produced it? We infer three of them: the gas pressure $p\_1$, the normalised vector potential $a\_0$ and the nitrogen concentration $c\_{N\_2}$. The solution is not guaranteed to be unique. We train an ensemble of mixture density networks that, for each beam, output several possible sets of settings with their probabilities and uncertainties, and test them on simulated beams with realistic measurement noise. On average, the predictions are accurate ($R^2 = 0.91$), yet for about two-thirds of the beams the inferred distribution has two competing solutions. These share nearly the same value of $a\_0^2 p\_1$, which controls how strongly the laser focuses itself in the plasma and, in earlier PALLAS studies, when electrons start to be injected. Keeping this quantity fixed gives beams that are practically indistinguishable with realistic diagnostics. A forward model used as a check removes unphysical solutions but cannot choose between the two plausible ones. We then test two ways to resolve the ambiguity. Adding the full electron energy spectrum improves the mean prediction ($R^2 = 0.94$), mostly through $a\_0$. It changes the weights of the two solutions but does not move them. A second measurement at a deliberately different plasma density is more effective. In paired PIC simulations, it reduces the error on $a\_0$ by a factor of 2.6, whereas repeating the measurement at the same density brings almost no gain.
The authors’ abstract, as arXiv lists it. arXiv’s listings, abstracts included, are free for anyone to reuse.
Read it on ReadSearch
Each opens after you create an account, and brings you back to this paper.
More in Machine Learning
LH$μ$C Concept: Energy-Frontier Antimuon-Proton Collisions at CERN
Learn the Dynamics, Enforce the Physics: Generative Latent Operators for High-Dimensional Beam Evolution
SensOFormer: Foundation Models for Particle Accelerators
Flexible Spectral-Normalized Neural Gaussian Process for Dynamic Aperture Prediction
Single-pass stochastic cooling for electron microscopy
Get the few papers worth your time in Machine Learning every morning.
ReadSearch reads the new papers in your field each day and brings you the few worth reading, each with its key finding in a sentence.