arXiv preprint ·
Conflicting History in Foundation Model Return Forecasts
- Published
- Source
- arXiv preprint, posted before peer review
- Original
- Read it at arXiv
- Topics
Abstract
Older observations can help a forecaster learn a predictive relationship while becoming misleading when that relationship changes. We study this tension using paired return histories that differ in older observations but share recent returns and the conditional distribution of the next return. Across five foundation-model forecasting procedures and three simulated processes, each evaluated on 1,024 independent replications, conflicting history reduces the probability of improving on zero in all 30 higher-signal comparisons. This loss of usefulness occurs despite successful signal recovery under stable conditions. A separate exploratory comparison on 56 assets finds that shortening inputs from 256 to 64 returns increases mean absolute error for every model by 1.77-4.58 basis points; neither length improves observed overall error over zero. The evidence distinguishes the ability to extract a signal from the ability to withstand conflicting history, while showing why context sensitivity alone does not justify discarding older data.
The authors’ abstract, as arXiv lists it. arXiv’s listings, abstracts included, are free for anyone to reuse.
Read it on ReadSearch
Each opens after you create an account, and brings you back to this paper.
More in Statistical Finance
Amortized Neural Filtering for Calibrated Posteriors in Statistical Arbitrage
Arithmetic Models for Commodity Futures, Vanilla, and Calendar Spread Options
What Prediction-Market Contracts Reveal at Launch: Trading Volume and Dispute Risk
Probability-Weighting Functions for Normal Tempered-Stable Laws: Orthogonal Channels and Information-Theoretic Indices
Intraday Forecasting Ability and Liquidity Provision of Institutional Traders
Get the few papers worth your time in Statistical Finance every morning.
ReadSearch reads the new papers in your field each day and brings you the few worth reading, each with its key finding in a sentence.