arXiv preprint ·
What Prediction-Market Contracts Reveal at Launch: Trading Volume and Dispute Risk
- Published
- Source
- arXiv preprint, posted before peer review
- DOI
- 10.1145/3858063.3858742
- Original
- Read it at arXiv
- Topics
Abstract
Using a near-census of 802,863 resolved markets listed on Polymarket between January 2023 and May 2026, and only information available at listing (the market's title and description, named resolution source, and contract metadata), we predict lifetime trading volume and whether settlement is later disputed. Contract information predicts trading volume well (out-of-sample $R^2 = 0.747$ for log volume), and most of the signal is interpretable: market topic provides the largest gain ($+0.289$ $R^2$ over a $0.220$ contract-feature baseline), wording and resolution-rule design add smaller but measurable improvements ($+0.027$ combined), and neural text models add little beyond the interpretable features. This performance does not survive a period of platform change coinciding with a shift in listing formats: accuracy in predicting whether a market reaches \$1,000 falls from AUC $0.940$ under same-period evaluation to $0.577$ when training on past quarters and testing on later ones. The loss concentrates in markets whose question forms were absent from training (76.9% of test markets; on familiar forms the model still reaches $0.778$), and a decomposition attributes more of it to a changed relationship between contract characteristics and demand than to an outdated mapping from text to features. Dispute predictors are more stable but less precise: launch-time features rank dispute risk far better than chance (AUC $0.78$), yet at a 0.31% base rate precision is too low for case-by-case prediction (average precision $0.012$), so the scores suit ranking groups of markets rather than forecasting individual disputes.
The authors’ abstract, as arXiv lists it. arXiv’s listings, abstracts included, are free for anyone to reuse.
Read it on ReadSearch
Each opens after you create an account, and brings you back to this paper.
More in Statistical Finance
Intraday Forecasting Ability and Liquidity Provision of Institutional Traders
Arithmetic Models for Commodity Futures, Vanilla, and Calendar Spread Options
Compiling and forecasting implied volatility surfaces via survey sampling, tempered inverse-probability sequence learning, and causal activity clocks
Amortized Neural Filtering for Calibrated Posteriors in Statistical Arbitrage
Do Round Numbers Hold Prices? Occupation Densities and Depth-Conditioned Hazards in the Limit Order Book
Get the few papers worth your time in Statistical Finance every morning.
ReadSearch reads the new papers in your field each day and brings you the few worth reading, each with its key finding in a sentence.