arXiv preprint ·
Complementary Vulnerabilities: Auditing and Governing Clinician-LLM Error Overlap
- Published
- Source
- arXiv preprint, posted before peer review
- Original
- Read it at arXiv
- Topics
Abstract
Health systems are deploying large language models (LLMs) into clinical workflows, often on the assumption that a second automated check can only reduce error. But a second reasoner reduces error only insofar as it fails differently from the first. We say that a clinician and a model have complementary vulnerabilities to the extent that they break down through different mechanisms and on different cases. The two reasoners' failure substrates differ: they are embodied and cognitive in the clinician, and statistical and generative in the model - so their weak points need not line up. That divergence is plausible rather than guaranteed, and the independence it creates is fragile, eroding when clinicians defer to the model or the model conforms to the clinician. We therefore propose a predeployment audit in which each site measures error overlap on its own cases. We also propose a governance model with which the site keeps those errors independent over time. Health systems should then judge a clinical artificial intelligence (AI) tool by whether its failures overlap with their clinicians' failures, as well as by its accuracy.
The authors’ abstract, as arXiv lists it. arXiv’s listings, abstracts included, are free for anyone to reuse.
Read it on ReadSearch
Each opens after you create an account, and brings you back to this paper.
More in Computers & Society
The World as Viewed by 136 Countries: An Open, Curated, Annotated, and Multilingual Dataset of 118 Million State Media Articles
Causal Humility: Governing the Authority of Fairness Claims Under Causal Uncertainty
Scam Town: Can Scam Education Spread Like a Vaccine?
When Care Expands and Control Declines: Understanding Digital Privacy in End-of-Life Care
Legal Guidance in the Wild: How Users Seek Legal Help in Real-World LLM Conversations
Get the few papers worth your time in Computers & Society every morning.
ReadSearch reads the new papers in your field each day and brings you the few worth reading, each with its key finding in a sentence.