arXiv preprint ·
Concept Representations in Vector Space: Toward an Interdisciplinary Study of Meaning Variation
- Published
- Source
- arXiv preprint, posted before peer review
- Original
- Read it at arXiv
- Topics
Abstract
An increasing number of disciplines recognize the explanatory potential of meaning-bearing mental structures through which individuals interpret the world and guide their behavior. Concept representations constitute a core class of these structures, emerging from individuals' experiences with concept referents and encoding and organizing their understanding of them. Recognizing a private level of meaning, where concepts are not objectively defined by rules in the world but constitute subjective structures in individuals' minds, raises a fundamental question: do different individuals actually mean the same thing when they invoke the same concept? As latent structures, concept representations are difficult to access and model empirically. The present study introduces a measurement framework that makes such representations empirically accessible through textual traces elicited under standardized conditions. Using transformer-based sentence embeddings, the framework maps standardized responses elicited for concepts into a high-dimensional shared vector space, opening concept representations to the systematic analysis of interindividual variation. It develops three analytical avenues: (1) comparing representational sharedness across concepts, (2) identifying variables that correlate with representational variation, and (3) examining how focal actors or subpopulations deviate from a reference population. Each avenue is illustrated through an empirical proof-of-concept drawing on a large-scale free-association dataset. Together, the demonstrations show how researchers from across disciplines can move from a research question and data source to analysis and interpretation. An accompanying GitHub repository provides a ready-to-use implementation of the framework for existing and custom datasets.
The authors’ abstract, as arXiv lists it. arXiv’s listings, abstracts included, are free for anyone to reuse.
Read it on ReadSearch
Each opens after you create an account, and brings you back to this paper.
More in Computation & Language / NLP
The World as Viewed by 136 Countries: An Open, Curated, Annotated, and Multilingual Dataset of 118 Million State Media Articles
Causal Humility: Governing the Authority of Fairness Claims Under Causal Uncertainty
Scam Town: Can Scam Education Spread Like a Vaccine?
When Care Expands and Control Declines: Understanding Digital Privacy in End-of-Life Care
Legal Guidance in the Wild: How Users Seek Legal Help in Real-World LLM Conversations
Get the few papers worth your time in Computation & Language / NLP every morning.
ReadSearch reads the new papers in your field each day and brings you the few worth reading, each with its key finding in a sentence.