arXiv preprint ·
Leveraging Mental Models for Human-Centered Explanations: A Systematic Design Approach Illustrated by Explainable Fake Review Identification
- Published
- Source
- arXiv preprint, posted before peer review
- Original
- Read it at arXiv
- Topics
Abstract
Explainable AI (XAI) often prioritizes model fidelity over user intelligibility, yielding explanations that satisfy technical transparency yet fail to support human sense-making. We propose a human-centered approach, MIND-X (Mental-model INtegrated Design for eXplainability), which aligns explanations with users' mental models, commonsense concepts, and judgment heuristics. Using fake review detection as a case study, we contribute: (1) a qualitative study (n=10) that elicits how people assess review credibility and produces an actionable, design-guiding taxonomy of perceptual cues; (2) a set of design principles that link those cues to explanation strategies and prompt LLMs to generate adaptive, language-based explanations; and (3) a quantitative evaluation (n=166) showing that these explanations offer distinct advantages over token-level transparency methods widely used in explainable text classification in terms of understandability, satisfaction, perceived trust, persuasiveness, and decision-making support. Rather than claiming general superiority, our evaluation illustrates how grounding explanations in users' everyday reasoning practices can produce more intelligible and context-sensitive accounts. Our findings advance human-centered explanation design beyond a mere "gloss of transparency," demonstrating that a mental-model-aligned design process can improve intelligibility and support accountability across user-centered explanation tasks.
The authors’ abstract, as arXiv lists it. arXiv’s listings, abstracts included, are free for anyone to reuse.
Read it on ReadSearch
Each opens after you create an account, and brings you back to this paper.
More in Human-Computer Interaction
GazeAgent: VLM-Guided Implicit Gaze Calibration from Egocentric Multimodal Behavior for AI Glasses
It's Complicated: Factors Influencing the Effectiveness of LLM-Generated Feedback in a Live Programming Course
From Neglect to Resignation: Understanding the Evolution of Mobile Privacy
UnexpectedParrots: Iterating Behavioral Experiment Design with In-Silico Simulations
Say It or Grab It? Conversational Control of UI Adaptations in Mixed Reality
Get the few papers worth your time in Human-Computer Interaction every morning.
ReadSearch reads the new papers in your field each day and brings you the few worth reading, each with its key finding in a sentence.