arXiv preprint ·
Is User Calibration Still Necessary for Continuous Myoelectric Control? A Closed-Loop Comparison of Calibration-Free Controllers
- Published
- Source
- arXiv preprint, posted before peer review
- Original
- Read it at arXiv
- Topics
Abstract
The need for user-specific calibration remains an often-cited barrier to widespread adoption of myoelectric control. Cross-user models trained on large multi-user datasets can now recognize gestures from unseen users without calibration, but they have been evaluated almost exclusively offline, leaving open whether calibration is still needed in closed-loop control. This study compared six calibration-free controllers, trained on 306 users of the EMG-EPN-612 dataset and used without any calibration data from the test participant, against three calibrated controllers in a closed-loop Fitts' law target-acquisition task with sixteen participants. The calibrated controllers achieved higher offline balanced accuracy (90.6% against 73.1% for the best controller of each paradigm), but completion rates did not differ significantly between paradigms, and the highest completion rate was achieved by a calibration-free controller. Calibrated controllers moved faster on successful acquisitions, partly because of their individually fitted speed mappings, though not significantly after correction for multiple comparisons. However, every calibration-free controller produced more direct and stable trajectories than every calibrated controller, even after adjusting for cursor speed. Offline accuracy did not predict completion rate across controllers or within participants, and across paradigms higher offline accuracy was associated with poorer trajectory quality in 15 of 16 participants. Without any calibration data from the end user, a model trained across a large population matched calibrated control in completion rate and exceeded it in trajectory quality. The offline accuracy gained through calibration should therefore not be taken as evidence of a closed-loop benefit.
The authors’ abstract, as arXiv lists it. arXiv’s listings, abstracts included, are free for anyone to reuse.
Read it on ReadSearch
Each opens after you create an account, and brings you back to this paper.
More in Signal Processing
Normalizing Flow for Neural-Enhanced Track-Before-Detect
Recurrent Temporal Restricted Boltzmann Machines as Unsupervised Encoders for Biomechanical Movement Sequences
ChronoChart: Setup-Agnostic Channel Charting for Label-Free Indoor Localization
PASS: A Trustworthy Precision Approach Simulation System for CAT III Integrity Algorithm Development
RAIL-5G: A Challenging Real-World Dataset and Benchmark for AI-Based 5G Indoor Localization
Get the few papers worth your time in Signal Processing every morning.
ReadSearch reads the new papers in your field each day and brings you the few worth reading, each with its key finding in a sentence.