arXiv preprint ·
GRAFT-EEG: Gauge-Aware Physical Field Transport for Cross-Dataset Motor-Imagery EEG
- Published
- Source
- arXiv preprint, posted before peer review
- Original
- Read it at arXiv
- Topics
Abstract
Cross-dataset EEG decoding often treats montage, reference, and active-sensor changes as representation shift, although they also alter the observation operator. We study target-statistics-blind transfer: fitting receives no target signal, label, or empirical statistic, and electrode coordinates only instantiate a fixed prediction operator. method removes the active-set common-reference gauge and transports each native mask through a template motor leadfield. A source-fitted spectral classifier anchors the decision; a bounded state-space-model (SSM) residual is secondary. We establish restricted identifiability and an operator-perturbation bound. Across five leave-one-dataset-out targets (253 participants), dynamic method achieved 60.865% equal-target balanced accuracy versus 52.684% for strict-clean 5/5 BIOT (hierarchical difference +8.182 points; 95% CI +6.382 to +10.196; positive in every target). On four EEGPT-clean targets, the descriptive means were 61.520% and 59.057%. In four post-hoc exact same-parent tests, FULL exceeded coordinate-basis, matched-spectrum, row-shuffled, and wrong-anatomy controls by 9.959, 9.698, 11.241, and 3.985 points, respectively (all 95% CIs excluded zero; Holm-adjusted P<0.001). A separate 60-participant same-paradigm evaluation retained a positive physical-operator contrast (+4.029 points; +2.338 to +5.773), whereas dynamic--static was inconclusive; its preregistered status is partial confirmation rather than unrestricted external validation. The SSM added +1.059 points (+0.013 to +1.892). Claims remain bounded to five binary motor-imagery domains and the tested operators.
The authors’ abstract, as arXiv lists it. arXiv’s listings, abstracts included, are free for anyone to reuse.
Read it on ReadSearch
Each opens after you create an account, and brings you back to this paper.
More in Machine Learning
PASS: A Trustworthy Precision Approach Simulation System for CAT III Integrity Algorithm Development
Is User Calibration Still Necessary for Continuous Myoelectric Control? A Closed-Loop Comparison of Calibration-Free Controllers
Beyond Latent Personalization: Integrating HRV-Conditioned Personalization via LLM for Interpretable Stress Detection
Recurrent Temporal Restricted Boltzmann Machines as Unsupervised Encoders for Biomechanical Movement Sequences
Normalizing Flow for Neural-Enhanced Track-Before-Detect
Get the few papers worth your time in Machine Learning every morning.
ReadSearch reads the new papers in your field each day and brings you the few worth reading, each with its key finding in a sentence.