arXiv preprint ·
Kolab: Benchmarking Human-Agent Collaboration in Long-Horizon Workflows
- Published
- Source
- arXiv preprint, posted before peer review
- Original
- Read it at arXiv
- Topics
Abstract
When humans collaborate with AI agents on long-horizon tasks, what happens to the agents' contributions? For solving long-horizon tasks, humans place greater importance on ongoing interaction with AI agents (e.g., revising plans) than on an agent's ability to complete the task in a single attempt. However, most agentic benchmarks have focused more on automation. Strong performance on such benchmarks does not imply effective real-world collaboration. Professional workflows offer a useful setting, as they often involve interdependent steps. To address this gap, we introduce Kolab, a new dataset of 115+ hours of screen recordings of 50 professionals from 40 occupations collaborating with agents on realistic, long-horizon problems. Kolab also contains participants' collaboration and output quality judgments. Our analysis reveals diverse collaboration patterns, highlighting the importance of when and how professionals coordinate with agents. A collaborative agent must do two things that automation benchmarks never test: anticipate whether experts will adopt, modify, or reject its contribution once it leaves the chat window to guide its next steps, and assess collaboration quality from the unfolding workflow without constant expert feedback. Our benchmark operationalizes both: (1) forecasting how professionals use agent contributions at diverse workflows, and (2) verifying their judgments of collaboration satisfaction and output quality. Findings show that frontier models, both agentic and non-agentic, overestimate collaboration with experts and struggle to distinguish between high- and low-quality collaboration. Longer workflow context does not consistently improve these predictions. As frontier agents cannot yet understand long-horizon collaboration with experts, we position Kolab as a valuable dataset for studying human-agent collaboration grounded in real professional workflows.
The authors’ abstract, as arXiv lists it. arXiv’s listings, abstracts included, are free for anyone to reuse.
Read it on ReadSearch
Each opens after you create an account, and brings you back to this paper.
More in Artificial Intelligence
XARA: A Multimodal Agentic System for eXtended Reality Experiment Generation
MultiPASE: Shape-Aware Comparative 3D Genome Analysis
Immersive Focus+Context Techniques to Assist in Interpretation of High Density Forest Point Clouds
OnBodyAI - Why the Next AI Needs a Body
SwitchTube: A Proof-of-Concept System Introducing "Adaptable Commitment Interfaces" as a Tool for Digital Wellbeing
Get the few papers worth your time in Artificial Intelligence every morning.
ReadSearch reads the new papers in your field each day and brings you the few worth reading, each with its key finding in a sentence.