arXiv preprint ·
What Human-AI Interaction Leaves Behind: Residual Human States -- A Trajectory-Based Framework and Multi-Study Analysis
- Published
- Source
- arXiv preprint, posted before peer review
- Original
- Read it at arXiv
- Topics
Abstract
Human-AI Interaction is commonly evaluated by what an artificial agent enables during use, yet interaction can also alter the human who acts next. We introduce Residual Human States, a trajectory-based framework for representing the potentially multidimensional human state carried forward after interaction with AI, relative to a relevant alternative trajectory. The framework distinguishes assisted output from human-state transition and derives four empirical propositions: multidimensionality, interaction-policy dependence, horizon dissociation, and temporal persistence. Its central claim is that assisted performance does not by itself determine the human state carried forward. We examine these propositions through four empirical cases with different inferential roles. Published medical-training evidence illustrates how one AI interaction history can be associated with both slightly higher observed accuracy on some later unaided cases and transmission of a systematic decision bias on others. A second diagnostic-learning study shows that later unaided behaviour differs across AI-support policies, while also revealing that aggregate accuracy cannot by itself distinguish improved discrimination from a shifted response criterion. In a classroom experiment, generative-AI tutoring substantially improved assisted practice performance without a corresponding detectable gain on a subsequent unaided exam. A longitudinal reanalysis of personalised AI dialogue further shows that residual contrasts can evolve across post-interaction horizons and that such change may arise from the comparison trajectory as well as from the focal intervention. Evaluating interactive AI systems therefore requires attention not only to contemporaneous performance, but also to which human states alternative interaction trajectories produce, relative to which counterfactuals, and how durably.
The authors’ abstract, as arXiv lists it. arXiv’s listings, abstracts included, are free for anyone to reuse.
Read it on ReadSearch
Each opens after you create an account, and brings you back to this paper.
More in Human-Computer Interaction
InSight: A Mobile Assistant Helping Visually Impaired People Navigate Unfamiliar Environment
Beyond Initial Creation: Two Decades of Community-based Chart Revisions from Wikimedia Commons
Safety for Whom? Benchmarking Understanding Beyond Refusal in Egocentric Multimodal Assistants
"The Rose Garden Is a Cemetery": Spatial Dissonance and Divergent Public Experiences of an Indigenous Augmented Reality Tour
CompanionSafe: From Multi-turn Safety Evaluation to Guardrails for AI Companions
Get the few papers worth your time in Human-Computer Interaction every morning.
ReadSearch reads the new papers in your field each day and brings you the few worth reading, each with its key finding in a sentence.