arXiv preprint ·
Communicating Uncertainty in AI-Supported Nurse Scheduling: Expert Co-Design and Evaluation of an Explainable AI Prototype
- Published
- Source
- arXiv preprint, posted before peer review
- Original
- Read it at arXiv
- Topics
Abstract
Nurse scheduling is a complex optimization problem in which nurses are assigned to shifts to meet staffing demands while complying with working-time limits, qualification requirements, and other operational and regulatory constraints. Artificial intelligence is increasingly being used to support this process by forecasting future staffing needs and providing advice on how to improve shift scheduling. Effective human-AI collaboration in nurse scheduling requires users to understand, interpret, and appropriately act on AI forecasts and advice. However, it remains insufficiently understood how healthcare professionals use transparency mechanisms like uncertainty communication and AI advice explanations when making staffing decisions. Applying a human-centered design approach, we iteratively developed a prototype decision support system for nurse scheduling and evaluated it through a mixed-methods user study with expert users. Using thematic analysis, questionnaire data, and eye tracking, we examine how healthcare professionals interact with the system and how uncertainty communication and explanations of AI advice influence understanding, decision confidence, trust, and usability. We found that the uncertainty communicated in AI forecasts was frequently misinterpreted and reduced decision confidence. Explanations were generally perceived positively, but did not significantly affect decision confidence or advice acceptance. We conclude with eight design implications derived from our findings, providing insights for the design of more transparent and effective AI-supported decision support tools in healthcare.
The authors’ abstract, as arXiv lists it. arXiv’s listings, abstracts included, are free for anyone to reuse.
Read it on ReadSearch
Each opens after you create an account, and brings you back to this paper.
More in Human-Computer Interaction
InSight: A Mobile Assistant Helping Visually Impaired People Navigate Unfamiliar Environment
Beyond Initial Creation: Two Decades of Community-based Chart Revisions from Wikimedia Commons
Safety for Whom? Benchmarking Understanding Beyond Refusal in Egocentric Multimodal Assistants
"The Rose Garden Is a Cemetery": Spatial Dissonance and Divergent Public Experiences of an Indigenous Augmented Reality Tour
CompanionSafe: From Multi-turn Safety Evaluation to Guardrails for AI Companions
Get the few papers worth your time in Human-Computer Interaction every morning.
ReadSearch reads the new papers in your field each day and brings you the few worth reading, each with its key finding in a sentence.