arXiv preprint ·
Falsification-proof non-market allocation mechanisms
- Published
- Source
- arXiv preprint, posted before peer review
- Original
- Read it at arXiv
- Topics
Abstract
Relying on manipulable characteristics to target the allocation of resources is fraught with difficulties. Naively optimal rules lead to falsification and allocative inefficiency. Optimizing the rule for allocative efficiency while accounting for falsification typically induces falsification, at a heavy cost to the agents. Moreover, falsification generates negative externalities. We characterize optimal falsification-proof rules under a broad range of falsification technologies. We also provide an honesty condition under which they solve the unconstrained problem of a planner who maximizes a weighted sum of allocative surplus and agents' welfare.
The authors’ abstract, as arXiv lists it. arXiv’s listings, abstracts included, are free for anyone to reuse.
Read it on ReadSearch
Each opens after you create an account, and brings you back to this paper.
More in Theoretical Economics
Designing Experiments for External Decision Makers
Better together? A performance theory of human-machine skill policies under generalization difficulty
Proportionality in Ranking Compression
The False Allure of "Security by Obscurity": A Game-Theoretic Approach
Extending Myerson's Optimal Auctions to Correlated Bidders via Neural Network Interpolation
Get the few papers worth your time in Theoretical Economics every morning.
ReadSearch reads the new papers in your field each day and brings you the few worth reading, each with its key finding in a sentence.