arXiv preprint ·
When Inputs Receive No Score: Evaluating Open-Web Event Admission on the Complete Stream
- Published
- Source
- arXiv preprint, posted before peer review
- Original
- Read it at arXiv
- Topics
Abstract
A Web item can link to the correct event without contributing information worth organizing. Evaluating item-level admission therefore begins with complete inputs, including those a processing pipeline fails to score. We study how this upstream selection changes ranking comparisons and constrains operational decisions. Across six instruction-model backbones, three strategies, and 602 human-annotated evaluation items, systems score different populations with different class compositions. Comparing rankings on shared inputs separates these population differences from discrimination. Score availability also limits attainable retention: four configurations score only ten of twelve positive development items, making a 90% full-stream target unreachable by threshold adjustment. Paired precision experiments show that this constraint depends on execution configuration as well as model choice. Qwen scores the same number of evaluation items under INT4 and INT8, yet exchanges four scored items for four others. Extraction-recovery diagnostics further show that obtaining more scores can increase false acceptance under an unchanged threshold. We connect these observations through a complete-stream evaluation protocol that checks calibration feasibility and separates upstream score loss from decision loss. The resulting account explains which inputs a system can score, what its operating point can achieve, and what it actually admits.
The authors’ abstract, as arXiv lists it. arXiv’s listings, abstracts included, are free for anyone to reuse.
Read it on ReadSearch
Each opens after you create an account, and brings you back to this paper.
More in Information Retrieval
Reference Wording Shapes Retrieval of Robot Task Instructions
RCER: Reconstructing Cross-Evidence Relations for Iterative Retrieval-Augmented Generation
AiSAQ-in-Filtering for DRAM-free Filtered Information Retrieval
AdCoEvo: A Co-Evolving Multi-Agent Advertising Delivery System
RALI@iKAT 2026: Retrieval-aware User Profile Denoising via Personalized Conversational Dense Retrieval
Get the few papers worth your time in Information Retrieval every morning.
ReadSearch reads the new papers in your field each day and brings you the few worth reading, each with its key finding in a sentence.