arXiv preprint ·
Reference Wording Shapes Retrieval of Robot Task Instructions
- Published
- Source
- arXiv preprint, posted before peer review
- Original
- Read it at arXiv
- Topics
Abstract
Identifying a robot task from a short instruction is sensitive to which descriptions are available for retrieval. We investigate this effect in the natural-language instructions included with the RLBench manipulation benchmark. We extract 296 fixed descriptions from 62 publicly available task files and compare five training-free lexical rankers over 80 random choices of one indexed description per task. Exact strings assigned to conflicting task labels are excluded from the primary score. Character n-gram TF-IDF achieves 61.3% mean top-1 accuracy on the resulting held-out instructions, compared with 55.6% for BM25 and 54.9% for word TF-IDF. Across gallery choices, character TF-IDF ranges from 55.2% to 66.8%; its 5th-95th percentile range is 56.9%-64.8%. Adding a second indexed description improves character TF-IDF by 7.0 percentage points on matched queries. These results quantify the influence of reference wording and representation choice on instruction-to-task retrieval under a consistent evaluation protocol.
The authors’ abstract, as arXiv lists it. arXiv’s listings, abstracts included, are free for anyone to reuse.
Read it on ReadSearch
Each opens after you create an account, and brings you back to this paper.
More in Artificial Intelligence
RCER: Reconstructing Cross-Evidence Relations for Iterative Retrieval-Augmented Generation
AiSAQ-in-Filtering for DRAM-free Filtered Information Retrieval
AdCoEvo: A Co-Evolving Multi-Agent Advertising Delivery System
RALI@iKAT 2026: Retrieval-aware User Profile Denoising via Personalized Conversational Dense Retrieval
Retrieve What Helps, Only When It Helps: Agentic Reinforcement Learning for Selective Retrieval-Augmented Machine Translation
Get the few papers worth your time in Artificial Intelligence every morning.
ReadSearch reads the new papers in your field each day and brings you the few worth reading, each with its key finding in a sentence.