arXiv preprint ·
Why Agentic Workflows Fail: A Taxonomy Derived from Literature and Empirical Data
- Published
- Source
- arXiv preprint, posted before peer review
- Original
- Read it at arXiv
- Topics
Abstract
Agentic workflows combine large language models with planning, memory, tools, execution environments, and iterative feedback. Their failures are difficult to diagnose because the same user-visible symptom may originate from model behavior, workflow orchestration, external tools, infrastructure, or their interaction. This paper presents a source-aware taxonomy of agentic workflow failures and applies it to evidence from academic literature and GitHub. The taxonomy combines source attribution with three empirical dimensions: a concrete failure-type dictionary, workflow-stage localization, and agent-capability localization. Its central structure is a two-axis localization matrix: workflow stages form the horizontal process axis and agent capabilities form the vertical functional axis. This design moves beyond taxonomies that mainly classify final failure manifestations by localizing intermediate process states inside agent operation. Our empirical comparison shows that literature-derived failures emphasize planning, reasoning, learning, perception, and knowledge-related mechanisms, whereas GitHub-derived failures concentrate on execution-stage, actuation-related, tool, API, and infrastructure failures. The dominant hotspot is iterative execution and actuation. These findings indicate that agentic workflow reliability should be treated as a systems problem rather than only a model-output problem. The taxonomy provides a basis for structured evaluation, root cause analysis, failure injection, and engineering triage.
The authors’ abstract, as arXiv lists it. arXiv’s listings, abstracts included, are free for anyone to reuse.
Read it on ReadSearch
Each opens after you create an account, and brings you back to this paper.
More in Software Engineering
When Agent Evaluation Becomes Unreliable: An Empirical Study of Oracle Failures and Configuration-Dependent Measurement in an LLM Agent Benchmark
Cross-Project Bug Localization: What Works, What Doesn't, and Why
SafeDSE: Joint Exploration of Safety Architecture Patterns, Mapping, and Scheduling for Dataflow Applications With Safety Arguments (Extended Version)
StateHarness: Maintaining Evolving Project State for Long-Horizon Coding Agents
EvoWeb: A Benchmark for Coding Agents on Evolving Web Applications
Get the few papers worth your time in Software Engineering every morning.
ReadSearch reads the new papers in your field each day and brings you the few worth reading, each with its key finding in a sentence.