arXiv preprint ·
When Agent Evaluation Becomes Unreliable: An Empirical Study of Oracle Failures and Configuration-Dependent Measurement in an LLM Agent Benchmark
- Published
- Source
- arXiv preprint, posted before peer review
- Original
- Read it at arXiv
- Topics
Abstract
Agent evaluation harnesses are software systems that run test suites, generate inputs, and decide outcomes with test oracles. This paper audits such software for reliability defects that score tables cannot reveal. We introduce an oracle-integrity auditing approach with five state-integrity invariants and three known-answer controls. We evaluate it by injecting seven oracle defect classes across two task domains and a synthetic domain. All injected defect classes are detected, and the repaired oracle has no false positives. Applied to an agent benchmark, the audit reveals a reward-function defect that changes the environment state before post-run scoring. Across 4,320 episodes, replay-based correction changes database-pass labels from 4,194 to 2,883 and reduces measured success from 94.3% to 65.5%. We also study configuration-dependent measurement effects. A component ablation over 3,240 episodes shows that the agent's policy documents, tool descriptions, and tool error strings influence observed trajectory reliability, with tool descriptions showing the largest exploratory effect (-9.2 pp) and error strings the smallest (-5.3 pp). A second task domain reverses the sign of the language effect, so the result is bounded to the tested configuration. Finally, we report a portability boundary: the auditing approach cannot validate a second independently implemented benchmark because the required reference terminal state cannot be reconstructed from its recorded API-call log. The paper releases a replication package containing the auditing suite, fault-injection catalogue, frozen records, deviation logs, and offline analysis entry points without network access, API keys, or model calls.
The authors’ abstract, as arXiv lists it. arXiv’s listings, abstracts included, are free for anyone to reuse.
Read it on ReadSearch
Each opens after you create an account, and brings you back to this paper.
More in Software Engineering
Cross-Project Bug Localization: What Works, What Doesn't, and Why
SafeDSE: Joint Exploration of Safety Architecture Patterns, Mapping, and Scheduling for Dataflow Applications With Safety Arguments (Extended Version)
StateHarness: Maintaining Evolving Project State for Long-Horizon Coding Agents
EvoWeb: A Benchmark for Coding Agents on Evolving Web Applications
Instructions Are Evidence, Not Objectives: Measuring Outcome Alignment of Agents
Get the few papers worth your time in Software Engineering every morning.
ReadSearch reads the new papers in your field each day and brings you the few worth reading, each with its key finding in a sentence.