arXiv preprint ·
Human Situational Awareness and Workload during Heterogeneous Autonomous Vehicle Hazard Monitoring: A Cross-Platform Study
- Published
- Source
- arXiv preprint, posted before peer review
- Original
- Read it at arXiv
- Topics
Abstract
As autonomous ground and aerial vehicles become increasingly capable, human operators are transitioning from direct control to supervisory monitoring roles. Maintaining Situational Awareness (SA) during rare but safety critical hazard events remains a fundamental challenge, particularly when operators must monitor heterogeneous autonomous platforms with different spatial and cognitive demands. This study develops a unified experimental framework for investigating human SA and workload during supervisory monitoring of autonomous ground and aerial vehicles under hazard conditions. Eighteen participants completed six within-subject conditions combining three interface modalities, namely, visual-only, haptic-only, and visual-haptic, with two platform types, ground vehicle and aerial drone. SA was measured using Situation Awareness Rating Technique (SART), while workload was assessed using the NASA Task Load Index (NASA-TLX). The key findings are: 1) Aerial monitoring produced significantly lower overall SA, higher situational demand, and greater workload than ground monitoring, driven by elevated Demand and reduced Understanding rather than diminished Supply. 2) Workload was consistently coupled with situational demand across all conditions, suggesting a stable SA-workload mechanism. 3) Both haptic-only and visual-haptic significantly improved overall SA relative to visual-only without increasing workload, demonstrating that interface design can enhance awareness within the existing workload envelope. These findings establish a cross-platform behavioural baseline for designing multimodal interfaces that enhance operator SA without elevating workload in heterogeneous autonomous vehicle systems.
The authors’ abstract, as arXiv lists it. arXiv’s listings, abstracts included, are free for anyone to reuse.
Read it on ReadSearch
Each opens after you create an account, and brings you back to this paper.
More in Human-Computer Interaction
GUIDE: Computationally Augmented Consensus for Trustworthy Clinical Practice Guidelines
InSight: A Mobile Assistant Helping Visually Impaired People Navigate Unfamiliar Environment
Exploring Mixed Reality for Engagement in Robotics: A Comparison of Robot Control Methods
Safety for Whom? Benchmarking Understanding Beyond Refusal in Egocentric Multimodal Assistants
{Access|Use|Sustain|_}-ability: Exploration and Quantification of a Linguistic Structure and Its Use in HCI
Get the few papers worth your time in Human-Computer Interaction every morning.
ReadSearch reads the new papers in your field each day and brings you the few worth reading, each with its key finding in a sentence.