arXiv preprint ·
The Format is the Filter: Scoring Format Fixes What an LLM Judge Can Express
- Published
- Source
- arXiv preprint, posted before peer review
- Original
- Read it at arXiv
- Topics
Abstract
When an LLM judge filters instruction-tuning data, its scoring format (binary verdict, 1--5 rating, 0--100 score, or comparison) is rarely justified or ablated. Holding the candidate pool, judge prompt, decoding and selection budget fixed, we score 15,406 UltraFeedback candidates under five formats with three judges, curate, fine-tune 66 models, and evaluate them with four judges. A 0--100 scale is worth only 7--12 equally used levels, two to three times a 1--5 scale rather than twenty, and a binary verdict leaves the top score tied in 77--78\% of prompts, so most selections are made at random. These properties are set by the format almost independently of the judge. Kendall's $τ_b$ hides them: it ranks binary best while $τ_a$ and top-1 agreement rank it last, because it discounts the ties a selector must break at random. Both comparative formats inherit a slot bias whose sign differs across judges. Downstream, curated data beat random selection under every evaluation judge, robust to length and markdown adjustment, but no ordering among formats is detectable. We propose four quantities that judge-based curation pipelines should report.
The authors’ abstract, as arXiv lists it. arXiv’s listings, abstracts included, are free for anyone to reuse.
Read it on ReadSearch
Each opens after you create an account, and brings you back to this paper.
More in Artificial Intelligence
When Agent Evaluation Becomes Unreliable: An Empirical Study of Oracle Failures and Configuration-Dependent Measurement in an LLM Agent Benchmark
Cross-Project Bug Localization: What Works, What Doesn't, and Why
SafeDSE: Joint Exploration of Safety Architecture Patterns, Mapping, and Scheduling for Dataflow Applications With Safety Arguments (Extended Version)
StateHarness: Maintaining Evolving Project State for Long-Horizon Coding Agents
EvoWeb: A Benchmark for Coding Agents on Evolving Web Applications
Get the few papers worth your time in Artificial Intelligence every morning.
ReadSearch reads the new papers in your field each day and brings you the few worth reading, each with its key finding in a sentence.