Integrating Feature Understandability into Feature Selection for Human-Centred Tabular Explanations

Abstract

Existing human-centred XAI research predominantly evaluates explanations after they have been generated. However, this fails to provide actionable insights into improving accessibility. This study incorporates human-based feature understandability into feature selection to improve the generation of human-centred explanations. Natural language explanations for machine learning models trained on tabular data often cite influential features in the input data to explain a given decision. As a consequence, users' ability to understand the produced explanation hinges on their understanding of the cited features. To quantify this natural-language feature understandability, Rossberg et al. proposed the Feature Understandability Scale, which assigns numerical `understandability scores' to features based on user feedback. To evaluate the degree to which these scores can improve machine learning explanation quality, this study collects understandability scores across two datasets, proposes an understandability-aware feature selection algorithm to select features that are both understandable and informative, and trains a random forest based on these feature subsets. The SHAP-based explanations generated by this model are evaluated using user feedback, and changes in explanation quality are assessed. The individual evaluation of the explanations showed that while the understandability-based explanations scored higher on average, the difference was not statistically significant. In contrast, the comparative evaluation found that participants preferred these explanations significantly more frequently than expected at the chance level. It is concluded that the integration of understandability can yield more understandable explanations at minimal cost to classification performance, although changes to quality require elucidation in larger cohorts.

The authors’ abstract, as arXiv lists it. arXiv’s listings, abstracts included, are free for anyone to reuse.

More in Human-Computer Interaction

• arXiv preprint · 12 October 2026

  AI Representations of Mental Health Stigma: Quantifying the Gap Between AI Estimations and Human Perceptions Across Gender Groups Using GPT-Based LLMs

  Soojong Kim, Hye Min Kim, Kwanho Kim and 1 other
• arXiv preprint · 13 October 2026

  Towards Green AI: Evaluating Energy Efficiency for Quantized LLM Inference

  Petar Basta
• arXiv preprint · 12 October 2026

  Beyond Single-Pathogen Forecasts: Predicting Shared Respiratory Hospital Burden from Influenza, COVID-19, and RSV

  Gaurob Saha, MinJae Woo and Lior Rennert
• arXiv preprint · 13 October 2026

  A null model to detect coordinated online behavior integrating evidence from multiple indicators

  Filipi Nascimento Silva, Manita Pote, Lake Yin and 3 others
• arXiv preprint · 12 October 2026

  {Access|Use|Sustain|_}-ability: Exploration and Quantification of a Linguistic Structure and Its Use in HCI

  Alarith Uhde and Paul Haimes

All new papers in Human-Computer Interaction