arXiv preprint ·

Recovering Low-Bit Failures in Vision-Language-Action Policies via Quantization-Conditioned Reinforcement Learning

Seongmin Park, Jaewon Lee, Yujun Heo, Yoonsik Kim, Seheon Choi, Hyoung-rock Kim and Jungwook Choi

Published
Source
arXiv preprint, posted before peer review
Original
Read it at arXiv
Topics
RoboticsComputer Vision

Abstract

Quantization lowers deployment costs of vision-language-action (VLA) policies but can compromise task completion. Across five VLA models and 4,050 real-world trials, we systematically reveal that quantization-aware training (QAT) generally improves on post-training quantization (PTQ) but leaves substantial gaps to full precision (FP) on long-horizon tasks and under visual and semantic shifts, while its imitation-based objective does not explicitly use rollout success or partial completion. To exploit these outcome signals, we introduce Quantization-Conditioned Reinforcement Learning (QCRL), an offline RL method coupling progress-based advantage estimation with quantization-aware source conditioning. FP rollouts supply reference experience beyond action-level distillation, progress-scaled terminal penalty distinguishes partial completion, and quantization-aware conditioning selects advantageous reference behavior within the quantized policy. We evaluate weight-only INT4 W4A16 on $π_{0.5}$ and GR00T N1.5 and joint weight-activation NVFP4 W4A4 on $π_{0.5}$. Using only in-distribution data, QCRL reaches 99.3% of FP's mean score across three visual-shift conditions for $π_{0.5}$ with INT4 W4A16, alongside 42.9% model-memory savings. With NVFP4 W4A4, it reaches 100.7% of the same FP baseline, alongside a $1.73\times$ speedup using NVFP4/FP8 deployment. Hardware gains are relative to FP16 on Jetson Thor.

The authors’ abstract, as arXiv lists it. arXiv’s listings, abstracts included, are free for anyone to reuse.

Read it on ReadSearch

Each opens after you create an account, and brings you back to this paper.

Already a reader? Sign in

All new papers in Robotics

Get the few papers worth your time in Robotics every morning.

ReadSearch reads the new papers in your field each day and brings you the few worth reading, each with its key finding in a sentence.

Papers belong to their authors and publishers; every page here links to the original. All research topics