arXiv preprint ·

Embodiment-Aware Inference-Time Search for Human Reaction Selection in Humanoid Retargeting

Yongpeng Cao, Masahiro Hirano and Yuji Yamakawa

Published
Source
arXiv preprint, posted before peer review
Published in
arXiv
DOI
10.48550/arxiv.2610.15274
Original
Read it at arXiv
Cited by
0 works, as OpenAlex counts them
Topics
Robotics

Abstract

Training humanoid robots to learn human behaviors requires expensive data collection, and human-robot interaction data can be even more difficult and costly to collect. Training a specialized reaction model for each humanoid embodiment can also be time-consuming and resource-intensive. Human-to-humanoid motion retargeting provides a more scalable alternative, allowing human-human reaction data to serve as a common motion representation for different humanoid embodiments. However, due to morphological and kinematic differences between humans and humanoid robots, a reaction preferred in human motion space may not be the most suitable one for execution on a particular robot embodiment. In this work, we propose an inference-time reaction search framework that leverages stochastic sampling from a generative reaction model and jointly considers reaction quality and humanoid embodiment feasibility. Given the observed interaction, our framework generates multiple plausible reaction candidates. Each candidate is retargeted to the target humanoid and evaluated using complementary interaction and embodiment-specific feasibility criteria, allowing candidate selection under the physical constraints of the target embodiment. Since the reaction generator remains frozen, the framework can adapt to different humanoid embodiments at inference time without retraining. Experimental results demonstrate that the proposed framework maintains overall human reaction quality while improving the feasibility of retargeted humanoid reactions across different embodiments. The proposed pipeline improves humanoid retargeting feasibility by 1.61%. Moreover, human-space and G1 best-candidate selections disagree in 78.98% of samples, demonstrating substantial embodiment dependence. Code will be released.

The authors’ abstract, as arXiv lists it. arXiv’s listings, abstracts included, are free for anyone to reuse.

Read it on ReadSearch

Each opens after you create an account, and brings you back to this paper.

Already a reader? Sign in

All new papers in Robotics

Get the few papers worth your time in Robotics every morning.

ReadSearch reads the new papers in your field each day and brings you the few worth reading, each with its key finding in a sentence.

Papers belong to their authors and publishers; every page here links to the original. All research topics