arXiv preprint ·
Reviewing Beyond the Change: Repository Size and Existing Code Across Agent and Human Pull Requests
- Published
- Source
- arXiv preprint, posted before peer review
- Original
- Read it at arXiv
- Topics
Abstract
Reviewers sometimes name existing repository items outside the change under review. We ask whether such references are more common in larger repositories, and whether the pattern differs between agent-authored and human-authored pull requests. An instrument resolves names in inline review comments against the base-commit repository; size-matched negative controls estimate chance matches. Among 92,042 comments on agent pull requests in 2,034 GitHub repositories, 6.5 per cent name an existing item outside the change. An internally pre-specified log-linear model finds an odds ratio of 1.35 per tenfold increase in code files (interval 1.15 to 1.59), and size-matched negative controls indicate that chance matching does not account for the rise. Exploratory analyses suggest that the association is concentrated from small to mid-sized repositories and is imprecise among large ones. Human pull requests in 1,845 of these repositories show a similar association. A pre-specified comparison finds a small agent excess just within the bound set as negligible, but the evidence does not establish a robust agent-specific difference. The instrument misses many references, so reported shares likely understate prevalence, and the validation cannot estimate how recall changes with repository size.
The authors’ abstract, as arXiv lists it. arXiv’s listings, abstracts included, are free for anyone to reuse.
Read it on ReadSearch
Each opens after you create an account, and brings you back to this paper.
More in Software Engineering
Verifying Autoware Controller Node by Combining Model Verification and Runtime Monitoring
When Agent Evaluation Becomes Unreliable: An Empirical Study of Oracle Failures and Configuration-Dependent Measurement in an LLM Agent Benchmark
PassSum: Leveraging Paths of Abstract Syntax Trees and Self-Supervision for Code Summarization
SafeDSE: Joint Exploration of Safety Architecture Patterns, Mapping, and Scheduling for Dataflow Applications With Safety Arguments (Extended Version)
Comparing the Pre-trained Models of Source Code by Re-pre-training under a Unified Setup
Get the few papers worth your time in Software Engineering every morning.
ReadSearch reads the new papers in your field each day and brings you the few worth reading, each with its key finding in a sentence.