arXiv preprint ·

AuthScribe: Supporting Agency and Authorship in LLM-Assisted Reflective Journaling

Lanping Hu, Yinsi Zhou, Zhenchang Xing, Xiaoyu Sun and Shidong Pan

Published
Source
arXiv preprint, posted before peer review
Original
Read it at arXiv
Topics
Human-Computer Interaction

Abstract

Large language models are increasingly used in reflective journaling, where articulating an experience is part of interpreting it. This raises questions about how writers retain authorship, exercise agency, and assess personalized assistance. We present AuthScribe, an LLM-assisted reflective journaling system that combines contextual anchors, writer-steered AI support, Autobiographical Citations, and read-only Provisional Drafts that require re-expression before AI-generated suggestions enter the journal. Retrieval and LLM inference run on-device. In a 14-day field deployment with 14 participants, grounding shifted from situating current experiences to reconnecting them with prior self-authored interpretations. Perceived agency remained stable through Week 1 and shifted during Week 2. Participants described authorship through transforming AI-generated suggestions into personally meaningful expression, and trusted personalized prompts when they could trace them to prior writing. We discuss design implications for adoption friction, longitudinal agency, and traceable personalization in AI systems for personal reflection.

The authors’ abstract, as arXiv lists it. arXiv’s listings, abstracts included, are free for anyone to reuse.

Read it on ReadSearch

Each opens after you create an account, and brings you back to this paper.

Already a reader? Sign in

All new papers in Human-Computer Interaction

Get the few papers worth your time in Human-Computer Interaction every morning.

ReadSearch reads the new papers in your field each day and brings you the few worth reading, each with its key finding in a sentence.

Papers belong to their authors and publishers; every page here links to the original. All research topics