arXiv preprint ·
CHEAR: Confusion-Hierarchy Evidence-Aware Reasoning for Cost-Efficient Human Activity Recognition
- Published
- Source
- arXiv preprint, posted before peer review
- Original
- Read it at arXiv
- Topics
Abstract
Large language models (LLMs) offer a new approach to wearable-sensor-based human activity recognition. Retrieval-augmented generation (RAG) further introduces similar motion examples and discriminative sensor knowledge, enabling decisions grounded in observations relevant to the current query. More evidence, however, does not necessarily mean better-organized evidence. When online prompts and LLM agents primarily orchestrate inference, decisions about which activities to compare and when to invoke discriminative knowledge remain concentrated at inference time. As the activity vocabulary grows, the model must repeatedly process more candidates and associated knowledge, whereas pruning candidates too early risks excluding the true activity. We propose confusion-hierarchy evidence-aware reasoning (CHEAR), which moves part of this knowledge organization offline. CHEAR constructs and validates an activity hierarchy from recurrent cross-subject retrieval errors and builds corresponding activity-pair knowledge. At inference time, the hierarchy orders candidate comparisons; the LLM retains candidates progressively, and local discriminative knowledge is accessed only for the remaining activities. Across eight datasets, CHEAR achieves 86.79\% mean cross-subject accuracy, a 75.91\% candidate reduction rate, and 96.44\% true-activity retention. Per-sample token use is 85.15\% lower on average than in a variant without the hierarchical structure. Mean accuracy across eight cross-dataset transfer directions is 88.81\%. These results show that organizing candidates and discriminative knowledge around observed activity confusions reduces online LLM input while maintaining recognition performance.
The authors’ abstract, as arXiv lists it. arXiv’s listings, abstracts included, are free for anyone to reuse.
Read it on ReadSearch
Each opens after you create an account, and brings you back to this paper.
More in Artificial Intelligence
MoMaTune: Model, Match, Then Tune Language Models for Numerical Records
Computational Reflective Equilibrium for Agentic AI: A Rawlsian Alignment Scaffold for Governance
Framework for an AI-Ready ARPES Community Database
When Does Compensating Inherited Quantization Error Help? Mean-Square Guarantees for Layer-Wise Quantization and Their Limits
ClinEdge: An Expert-Graded Benchmark of Real Patient Edge Cases Where Frontier Multimodal Models Fail
Get the few papers worth your time in Artificial Intelligence every morning.
ReadSearch reads the new papers in your field each day and brings you the few worth reading, each with its key finding in a sentence.