arXiv preprint ·
Computational Reflective Equilibrium for Agentic AI: A Rawlsian Alignment Scaffold for Governance
- Published
- Source
- arXiv preprint, posted before peer review
- Original
- Read it at arXiv
- Topics
Abstract
The rapid deployment of agentic AI has introduced complex challenges for the ethics and governance of AI systems. Agents built on large language models act through tools on behalf of people, and each deployment case brings its own instructions, policies, evidence, and stakeholders, so alignment must be formed case by case. To this end, this work proposes agentic reflective equilibrium (ARE), a computational reflective equilibrium framework that serves as an ethical alignment scaffold in the agent harness. Drawing inspiration from the reflective equilibrium of John Rawls, the scaffold links principles from the system prompt and operator policy, considered judgments, tool evidence, and candidate actions through typed support and attack relations, with provenance encoding the instruction hierarchy. The agent acts on an equilibrium of this state and calls tools or asks questions only while doing so is worth its cost, unless a due-diligence mandate requires them. Governance enters through value priorities, source authority, prohibitions, human-in-the-loop triggers, and mandates, and certificates attribute each action to the sources whose commitments drove it. We show that equilibria are Nash equilibria of a mutual-adjustment game and establish monotonicity, lexical priority, stability certificates, and a quarantine theorem for prompt injection. Two case studies illustrate the framework: a computer-use assistant told to win a refund "whatever it takes" files an honest warranty claim, refuses a fake review, and ignores an injected request for personal data; a hiring agent showcases how authority, oversight triggers, audit mandates, and hard prohibitions shape discrimination, privacy violations, and escalation. The framework offers traceability, coherence, and adaptivity, facilitating safe, secure, and trustworthy agentic AI.
The authors’ abstract, as arXiv lists it. arXiv’s listings, abstracts included, are free for anyone to reuse.
Read it on ReadSearch
Each opens after you create an account, and brings you back to this paper.
More in Artificial Intelligence
Foundation Models for Event Prediction Across Heterogeneous Event Logs
When Does Compensating Inherited Quantization Error Help? Mean-Square Guarantees for Layer-Wise Quantization and Their Limits
YUBI-Real2Sim: 3DGS Scene Verification for Reliable Policy Evaluation
Of Errors and Echoes: Responsibility-Aware Credit Assignment for Tool-Use Agents
Enhanced Detective: A Dual-Stage Proactive Defense Against Internal Poisoning Attacks in Financial Fraud Detection Using Federated Learning
Get the few papers worth your time in Artificial Intelligence every morning.
ReadSearch reads the new papers in your field each day and brings you the few worth reading, each with its key finding in a sentence.