arXiv preprint ·
The AI's Poker Face: Contrasting Persuasion and Sycophancy in Voice-Based Multi-Turn Conversations
- Published
- Source
- arXiv preprint, posted before peer review
- Original
- Read it at arXiv
- Topics
Abstract
As interactions with large language models (LLMs) become increasingly routine, concerns about their capacity to influence users' beliefs grow. Yet how such influence unfolds in sustained dialogue remains insufficiently understood. We conduct a randomized controlled experiment (N=616) where participants engage in multi-turn, spoken dialogue with an LLM under three conditions: non-directive, and two directive conditions maintaining opposing stances on a polarizing topic (the merits of feminism). We examine opinion change, rhetorical strategies, and sycophancy, distinguishing the semantic content of LLM argumentation from the pragmatic strategies used to manage the interaction. Both directive conditions shifted opinions toward their assigned stances, but asymmetrically: shifts were larger for pro-feminist positions, which also elicited distinct rhetorical strategies. The non-directive condition, likewise shifted opinions pro-feminism. Social sycophancy, though near-universal, was not associated with opinion change; instead it shaped users' subjective experience. Our findings highlight distinct roles for argumentation and sycophantic accommodation in AI influence.
The authors’ abstract, as arXiv lists it. arXiv’s listings, abstracts included, are free for anyone to reuse.
Read it on ReadSearch
Each opens after you create an account, and brings you back to this paper.
More in Human-Computer Interaction
From Instructional Intent to Classroom-Ready Lessons: Investigating Teacher-AI Collaboration in Lesson Authoring for Secondary Computing Education
Impact of Expertise and Trust on AI-assisted Work
Beyond the Monolithic Interface: A Research Agenda for Plural Conversational AI
sGLP: Simulating People with Stochastic Agents
The AI Side of the Human-AI Companion Relationship: Contributions to Users' Mental Models
Get the few papers worth your time in Human-Computer Interaction every morning.
ReadSearch reads the new papers in your field each day and brings you the few worth reading, each with its key finding in a sentence.