arXiv preprint ·
How Anthropomorphic Attitudes Toward Agents Divide User Behavior, and How Design Should Change
- Published
- Source
- arXiv preprint, posted before peer review
- Original
- Read it at arXiv
- Topics
Abstract
Studies of conversational agents rely on interviews, surveys, lab tasks, or taxonomies. Whether anthropomorphic naming splits those patterns, and whether replies should change, lack field evidence. We report a field study of a desktop assistant (May-August 2026; n=257). Stance is an anthropomorphic assistant name (118 users; 45.9%). Behavior comes from a 128-unit sparse-autoencoder codebook, identity tags, and opening lexicons. Ranks differ by stance (Spearman rho=+0.249 vs. null mean +0.382; p=.0419). Teacher and tutoring identities covary with renaming, an introverted task-only orientation against it; renamers greet more and command less; confiding shows the codebook's largest gap. We revise the agent: greet and receive affect on relational openings, execute directly on tasking. In 1,744 judgments (n=129), renamers chose the revised reply far more often than default-name users on being treated as a person and having affect received, less robustly on willingness to continue, and neither judged it worse on task interference.
The authors’ abstract, as arXiv lists it. arXiv’s listings, abstracts included, are free for anyone to reuse.
Read it on ReadSearch
Each opens after you create an account, and brings you back to this paper.
More in Human-Computer Interaction
From Instructional Intent to Classroom-Ready Lessons: Investigating Teacher-AI Collaboration in Lesson Authoring for Secondary Computing Education
Impact of Expertise and Trust on AI-assisted Work
Beyond the Monolithic Interface: A Research Agenda for Plural Conversational AI
sGLP: Simulating People with Stochastic Agents
The AI Side of the Human-AI Companion Relationship: Contributions to Users' Mental Models
Get the few papers worth your time in Human-Computer Interaction every morning.
ReadSearch reads the new papers in your field each day and brings you the few worth reading, each with its key finding in a sentence.