arXiv preprint ·
Risk Ceilings and Development Deadlines: Pacing AI under Uncertain Safety Productivity
- Published
- Source
- arXiv preprint, posted before peer review
- Original
- Read it at arXiv
- Topics
Abstract
Can a regulator promise both a risk ceiling and a development deadline when safety productivity is unknown? A ceiling below the final model's unprotected hazard requires a minimum stock of safety knowledge, so both promises hold only if weak research can be ruled out. Learning first and then replaying development, with spare compute in safety, comes close to that minimum. In a calibration with only state risk, constant safety yield, and full knowledge transfer, it needs only 3.3 percent more productivity than the necessary bound. Customer services pay for the guarantee. Rules that fix compute allocation fix dates, not risk.
The authors’ abstract, as arXiv lists it. arXiv’s listings, abstracts included, are free for anyone to reuse.
Read it on ReadSearch
Each opens after you create an account, and brings you back to this paper.
More in General Economics
The Financing of Debt Relief: Intermediary Liquidity and the Value of Borrower Information
Validity Without Ground Truth: What Stated-Preference Economics Offers the Evaluation of Language Models
AI-Mediation in Retail Markets: Revenue Effects and Assortment Optimization
Personalized Recommendations Without Inducing Congestion: Mitigating Disparities in the NYC High School Match
Displacement Is Endogenous: AI Workers in a Search-and-Matching Labor Market
Get the few papers worth your time in General Economics every morning.
ReadSearch reads the new papers in your field each day and brings you the few worth reading, each with its key finding in a sentence.