arXiv preprint ·
Personalized Recommendations Without Inducing Congestion: Mitigating Disparities in the NYC High School Match
- Published
- Source
- arXiv preprint, posted before peer review
- Original
- Read it at arXiv
- Topics
Abstract
Algorithmic recommendations can help participants navigate large matching markets. For example, recommendations for school and college choices may reduce information frictions and disparities in access to high-performing programs. At scale, however, recommenders in capacity-constrained settings can be self-defeating: if they steer too many users toward the same items, then even users who were originally predicted to have a high chance of matching to an item may not, due to increased competition. In this paper, we formalize this phenomenon of recommendation-induced congestion; motivated by the NYC high school match, we show that naive recommendations can cause sharp decreases in program acceptance rates, most affecting applicants with the fewest nearby options. Next, we propose and theoretically analyze a congestion-aware, bilevel optimize-and-simulate approach to allocate recommendations and improve match outcomes safely, in equilibrium. Finally, we deploy this approach in the 2025-26 admissions cycle of the NYC high school match, aiming to reduce disparities by highlighting personalized lists of nearby, high-performing programs where an applicant has a high predicted offer likelihood. In a randomized controlled trial, we find that 16.4% of treatment applicants ranked a recommended program, versus 10.5% of control applicants who ranked a program they would have been recommended (57% relative increase; $p$=0.011); 5.6% of treatment applicants matched to such a program, versus 3.3% of control applicants (71% relative increase; $p$=0.071); further, no treatment applicant was rejected from a recommended program. Our findings suggest that recommenders should be analyzed and designed as market-shaping interventions.
The authors’ abstract, as arXiv lists it. arXiv’s listings, abstracts included, are free for anyone to reuse.
Read it on ReadSearch
Each opens after you create an account, and brings you back to this paper.
More in Computers & Society
Validity Without Ground Truth: What Stated-Preference Economics Offers the Evaluation of Language Models
Who Keeps the Gains from Personal AI Assistants? Seller Adaptation and the Unassisted in a Language-Model Market Simulation
Risk Ceilings and Development Deadlines: Pacing AI under Uncertain Safety Productivity
Synthetic Cultural Agents from Aggregate Anchors
The Financing of Debt Relief: Intermediary Liquidity and the Value of Borrower Information
Get the few papers worth your time in Computers & Society every morning.
ReadSearch reads the new papers in your field each day and brings you the few worth reading, each with its key finding in a sentence.