arXiv preprint ·
What does it mean to use AI critically? Unpacking critical AI literacy through students' evaluation of AI-generated content
- Published
- Source
- arXiv preprint, posted before peer review
- Original
- Read it at arXiv
- Topics
Abstract
Although critical AI literacy has emerged as an important educational goal, the construct remains conceptually broad and insufficiently specified for guiding students' day-to-day interactions with AI. This study examines how students critically evaluated AI-generated content. Drawing on an analysis of students' chatbot interactions and written reflections, we first identified seven stages of AI-supported academic task completion and five functional roles assumed by AI. More importantly, we identified eight evaluative lenses that students used to assess AI-generated responses (accuracy, completeness, task alignment/relevance, personalization, practicality, creativity, ethics, and bias). The findings suggest that critical AI literacy extends beyond verifying the factual accuracy of AI-generated information. Rather, critically engaging with AI involves situated and multidimensional judgment about the epistemic quality, contextual fit, practical feasibility, creative value, and ethical implications of AI-generated content. The framework offers both a conceptual contribution to the emerging literature on critical AI literacy and a practical tool for educators seeking to help learners move from passive acceptance of AI toward deliberate, context-sensitive, and responsible human judgment.
The authors’ abstract, as arXiv lists it. arXiv’s listings, abstracts included, are free for anyone to reuse.
Read it on ReadSearch
Each opens after you create an account, and brings you back to this paper.
More in Human-Computer Interaction
Reading Position Is the Baseline to Beat: A Time-Ordered Evaluation of Personalised Highlight Prediction
Intent Graph: Navigating the Analytical Reasoning Space for Exploratory Data Analysis
AI-Assisted Submissions in Online Research Are Rare and Highly Concentrated but Routinely Approved
TAP3D: Thermal-Assisted 3D Human Point Clouds
Beyond Activation: Gaze Invocation with Visible Status for an Embodied AR Assistant in Co-Located Collaboration
Get the few papers worth your time in Human-Computer Interaction every morning.
ReadSearch reads the new papers in your field each day and brings you the few worth reading, each with its key finding in a sentence.