arXiv preprint ·
The Handover Problem: Governing Autonomy Transitions in Human-AI Collaboration
- Published
- Source
- arXiv preprint, posted before peer review
- Published in
- arXiv
- DOI
- 10.48550/arxiv.2610.10352
- Original
- Read it at arXiv
- Cited by
- 0 works, as OpenAlex counts them
- Topics
Abstract
Human-machine systems rarely operate at a fixed level of AI autonomy. As operators and AI systems collaborate over time, control must shift: the AI can take on more responsibility when collaboration is stable, maintain its current role when evidence is ambiguous, or return control to the human when conditions deteriorate. Existing work on adaptive automation, supervisory control, trust in automation, and deskilling explains parts of this problem, but provides no auditable, multi-signal criterion for governing when autonomy should change across multi-cycle workflows. We formalise this challenge as the Handover Problem: deciding, at each operational cycle, whether to escalate, maintain, or revert AI autonomy while keeping the process reversible, recoverable, and auditable. We introduce the Handover Readiness Score (HRS), a transparent composite measure that integrates four signal dimensions: operator readiness, human-AI trust, learning stability, and operational performance. It is combined with a hysteresis-based transition policy that requires sustained positive evidence before increasing autonomy but reverts promptly when conditions worsen. Across software engineering and manufacturing domains, the HRS and hard safety guards address complementary failure regimes: guards enforce immediate corrective action when a single indicator breaches a critical threshold, while the HRS detects the slow, multi-signal erosion of operator readiness that no individual guard can observe. The framework establishes autonomy handover as a governance problem requiring explicit, composite, and auditable criteria. This provides a conceptual and formal foundation that adaptive automation research has not previously provided.
The authors’ abstract, as arXiv lists it. arXiv’s listings, abstracts included, are free for anyone to reuse.
Read it on ReadSearch
Each opens after you create an account, and brings you back to this paper.
More in Artificial Intelligence
Reading Position Is the Baseline to Beat: A Time-Ordered Evaluation of Personalised Highlight Prediction
Intent Graph: Navigating the Analytical Reasoning Space for Exploratory Data Analysis
AI-Assisted Submissions in Online Research Are Rare and Highly Concentrated but Routinely Approved
TAP3D: Thermal-Assisted 3D Human Point Clouds
Beyond Activation: Gaze Invocation with Visible Status for an Embodied AR Assistant in Co-Located Collaboration
Get the few papers worth your time in Artificial Intelligence every morning.
ReadSearch reads the new papers in your field each day and brings you the few worth reading, each with its key finding in a sentence.