arXiv preprint ·
When Scientific Cognition Is No Longer Scarce
- Published
- Source
- arXiv preprint, posted before peer review
- Published in
- arXiv
- DOI
- 10.48550/arxiv.2610.10241
- Original
- Read it at arXiv
- Cited by
- 0 works, as OpenAlex counts them
- Topics
Abstract
AI could change which parts of science impede progress. Consider a world in which machine systems are better, faster, and cheaper than people at most scientific work that can be done through a computer. Our question is what would limit science in that world. Literature synthesis, hypothesis generation, software development, simulation, and analysis could become abundant, while experiments, observations, well-supported conclusions, and accountable institutional au- thority remain scarce. Science would then be constrained by a different set of resources. In this paper, we call this change the scarcity inversion and consider four parts of it: selection, physical access, validation, and organizational choice. This change is arriving first in mathematics and coding/software/algorithm design, where the whole scientific loop can run inside computation. For national laboratories, the change could be striking. Their distinctive role is to turn abundant machine reasoning into trustworthy results by combining controlled experiments, protected data, expert judgment, and accountable authority. The practical question is how facilities, verification, provenance, resource allocation, and scientific governance should change when reasoning is plentiful and trustworthy evidence is scarce.
The authors’ abstract, as arXiv lists it. arXiv’s listings, abstracts included, are free for anyone to reuse.
Read it on ReadSearch
Each opens after you create an account, and brings you back to this paper.
More in Computers & Society
AI-Assisted Submissions in Online Research Are Rare and Highly Concentrated but Routinely Approved
Risk Ceilings and Development Deadlines: Pacing AI under Uncertain Safety Productivity
The AI Evaluation Ecosystem
Can a System-One LLM Perform Knowledge Tracing When Few or No Learners Are Logged?
The Confidence Game: Strategic Miscalibration in Human-AI Delegation
Get the few papers worth your time in Computers & Society every morning.
ReadSearch reads the new papers in your field each day and brings you the few worth reading, each with its key finding in a sentence.