arXiv preprint ·
Before Bringing It Up: When and How AI Companions Should Use Memory
- Published
- Source
- arXiv preprint, posted before peer review
- Original
- Read it at arXiv
- Topics
Abstract
Memory can sustain AI companionship, yet even accurate recollection can be inappropriate to use. Two rounds of formative interviews with 14 users (n = 6 exploratory, n = 8 memory-focused) motivate asking what a companion should consider before using past information. Eight themes inform Reconsider, a single-call procedure with five checks and four handling modes, evaluated on 80 scenarios across five models over 400 blinded within-model pairs. Two LLM judges favored Reconsider by net margins of +15 and +23 percentage points, with bootstrap intervals excluding zero for three of five models but not for GPT or Claude. Evaluator analysis linked judge scoring differences to model family, and a preliminary matched-guidance control isolating memory-specific content gave positive margins. We contribute an interview-grounded design framework for memory use and an evaluation that scrutinizes its own evaluators.
The authors’ abstract, as arXiv lists it. arXiv’s listings, abstracts included, are free for anyone to reuse.
Read it on ReadSearch
Each opens after you create an account, and brings you back to this paper.
More in Human-Computer Interaction
Reading Position Is the Baseline to Beat: A Time-Ordered Evaluation of Personalised Highlight Prediction
Intent Graph: Navigating the Analytical Reasoning Space for Exploratory Data Analysis
AI-Assisted Submissions in Online Research Are Rare and Highly Concentrated but Routinely Approved
TAP3D: Thermal-Assisted 3D Human Point Clouds
Beyond Activation: Gaze Invocation with Visible Status for an Embodied AR Assistant in Co-Located Collaboration
Get the few papers worth your time in Human-Computer Interaction every morning.
ReadSearch reads the new papers in your field each day and brings you the few worth reading, each with its key finding in a sentence.